2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10653-019-00337-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical (soil) and phylogenetic (plant taxa) factors affecting accumulation of macro- and trace elements in three natural plant species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean concentration of both Cu and Zn in the leaves of the plants around the Remance gold mine, compared to plants from other parts of the world, fell within the ranges known for between uncontaminated (Shtangeeva et al, 2020a , 2020b ) and contaminated zones (Hussain et al, 2019 ), while the As, Sb and Ba values were similar to those reported from contaminated areas (Getaneh & Alemayehu, 2006 ; Hussain et al, 2019 ). More specifically, the Cu concentrations in grass were similar to those from contaminated areas (Hussain et al, 2019 ), while As, Sb and Ba obtained higher values than those reported in uncontaminated areas (Shtangeeva et al, 2020a , 2020b ), and the Zn concentrations were similar to those from uncontaminated areas (Kabata-Pendias, 2011 ). All these values imply harmful effects on the health of the cattle grazing in the study area for these PTEs because they are higher than those recommended for the animal nutrition of ruminants (Johnsen & Aaneby, 2019 ), as is the case of Cu and Zn (NRC, 2001 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean concentration of both Cu and Zn in the leaves of the plants around the Remance gold mine, compared to plants from other parts of the world, fell within the ranges known for between uncontaminated (Shtangeeva et al, 2020a , 2020b ) and contaminated zones (Hussain et al, 2019 ), while the As, Sb and Ba values were similar to those reported from contaminated areas (Getaneh & Alemayehu, 2006 ; Hussain et al, 2019 ). More specifically, the Cu concentrations in grass were similar to those from contaminated areas (Hussain et al, 2019 ), while As, Sb and Ba obtained higher values than those reported in uncontaminated areas (Shtangeeva et al, 2020a , 2020b ), and the Zn concentrations were similar to those from uncontaminated areas (Kabata-Pendias, 2011 ). All these values imply harmful effects on the health of the cattle grazing in the study area for these PTEs because they are higher than those recommended for the animal nutrition of ruminants (Johnsen & Aaneby, 2019 ), as is the case of Cu and Zn (NRC, 2001 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In tea leaves, the average Cu concentration fell within the same range as in uncontaminated areas (Kabata-Pendias, 2011 ), and Zn concentrations were much higher than those reported for commercial tea by Idrees et al ( 2020 ). In grass and plants, Cu, As, Sb, and Ba were higher than in the uncontaminated sites reported by Shtangeeva et al, ( 2020a , b ).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, we believe that a general relationship has been established between the chemical element accumulation by plants and the characteristics of the ions. With the primary role of ions in plant nutrition, we assume the presence of general laws of the chemical element migration, both in the mineral part of the biosphere and in living organisms that corresponds well to recent findings [62][63][64].…”
Section: General Biogeochemical Accumulation Patternssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Noteworthy, the restrictive role of gypsum soils on vegetation only appears under arid and semiarid conditions (Escudero et al ., 2015), limiting the potential role of climate on the elemental composition of gypsum plants. The small effect observed for soil properties on the elemental composition of Iberian gypsum plants contrasts with the results of previous studies in which soil had a marked effect on the elemental composition of plants (Ågren & Weih, 2012; Shtangeeva et al ., 2020). These discrepancies cannot be explained by a low resolution in our dataset, but are likely to be due to the low variability in the soil conditions included in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%