1996
DOI: 10.1016/0375-6742(96)00009-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical mapping based on overbank sediments in the heavily industrialised border area of Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most heavily polluted layers tend to accumulate during the most intensive production of metals, whereas, in the period prior to industrial activity, concentrations of heavy metal are more similar to geochemical background values (De Vos, Ebbing, Hindeel, Schalich, & Van Keer, 1996;Swennen & Van der Sluys, 1998). Heavy metals resulting from anthropogenic contamination are associated with organic matter present in the thin fraction of the sediments, adsorbed on Fe-Mn hydrous oxides, or precipitated as hydroxides, sulphides and carbonates (Forstner, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The most heavily polluted layers tend to accumulate during the most intensive production of metals, whereas, in the period prior to industrial activity, concentrations of heavy metal are more similar to geochemical background values (De Vos, Ebbing, Hindeel, Schalich, & Van Keer, 1996;Swennen & Van der Sluys, 1998). Heavy metals resulting from anthropogenic contamination are associated with organic matter present in the thin fraction of the sediments, adsorbed on Fe-Mn hydrous oxides, or precipitated as hydroxides, sulphides and carbonates (Forstner, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is significant, as pointed out by all researchers in this field, for the greatest part of the variance to be ascribed to the geochemical data variance or geochemical (spatial) variation; otherwise, a contoured geochemical distribution map cannot be produced (Garrett, 1969;Howarth, 1983;Sharp, 1987). In the latter case, where geochemical data show no spatial persistence, element concentrations may be plotted at the sample sites as variable-size dots (Bølviken et al, 1986;Bj€ orklund and Gustavsson, 1987;Lahermo et al, 1990), symbols (De Vos et al, 1996), exploratory data analysis symbols (Englund and Sparks, 1988;O'Connor et al, 1988;Demetriades, 1990), or recording on maps the sample site analytical data (Van der Sluys et al, 1997). However, final decisions about geochemical distribution map plotting may be decided upon following a thorough geostatistical structural analysis of the data (Journel and Huijbregts, 1978;Rendu, 1978;Clark, 1979;Isaaks and Srivastava, 1989;Clark and Harper, 2007a, 2007b.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Geochemical Data Set: Quality And Reliabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, owing to widening scope of investigations in environmental geochemistry these media have soon become the norm for pollution assessment (e.g. Cappuyns and Swennen 2004;De Vos et al 1996;Macklin et al 1994;Peh et al 2008;Swennen et al 2002). Voluminous research work during the recent years has largely settled the earlier disputes in scientific literature about their suitability for studying geochemical patterns on local and regional scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%