2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemer.2021.125789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical evidence for a multi-source origin of manganese in the Montaña de Manganeso deposit, central Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 107 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various geochemical indicator ratios in most iron-manganese ores from the LKR such as (Mn + Fe)/Ti , Ba/Ti (>0.15), Y/Ho (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35), (Y/Y*) N (>1), (Eu/Eu*) N (>1), along with relatively low total REE + Y (<100 ppm) and Th (0.46-7.93 ppm), are compatible with the hydrothermal origin of iron and manganese minerals in the LKR. In particular, the positive Eu anomaly and the lack of a negative Ce anomaly in the majority of ore samples from the LKR deposits argue against any substantial role of seawater precipitation in the formation of Fe-Mn oxides and hydroxides [112][113][114][115][116]. However, in individual samples from the Poperechny deposit, some of these indicator parameters are compatible with the hydrogenic Fe-Mn mineral formation [117][118][119] suggesting that, at least locally in the LKR, a limited hydrogenic (seawater) component was also involved in the ore formation process [68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various geochemical indicator ratios in most iron-manganese ores from the LKR such as (Mn + Fe)/Ti , Ba/Ti (>0.15), Y/Ho (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35), (Y/Y*) N (>1), (Eu/Eu*) N (>1), along with relatively low total REE + Y (<100 ppm) and Th (0.46-7.93 ppm), are compatible with the hydrothermal origin of iron and manganese minerals in the LKR. In particular, the positive Eu anomaly and the lack of a negative Ce anomaly in the majority of ore samples from the LKR deposits argue against any substantial role of seawater precipitation in the formation of Fe-Mn oxides and hydroxides [112][113][114][115][116]. However, in individual samples from the Poperechny deposit, some of these indicator parameters are compatible with the hydrogenic Fe-Mn mineral formation [117][118][119] suggesting that, at least locally in the LKR, a limited hydrogenic (seawater) component was also involved in the ore formation process [68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%