“…Various geochemical indicator ratios in most iron-manganese ores from the LKR such as (Mn + Fe)/Ti , Ba/Ti (>0.15), Y/Ho (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35), (Y/Y*) N (>1), (Eu/Eu*) N (>1), along with relatively low total REE + Y (<100 ppm) and Th (0.46-7.93 ppm), are compatible with the hydrothermal origin of iron and manganese minerals in the LKR. In particular, the positive Eu anomaly and the lack of a negative Ce anomaly in the majority of ore samples from the LKR deposits argue against any substantial role of seawater precipitation in the formation of Fe-Mn oxides and hydroxides [112][113][114][115][116]. However, in individual samples from the Poperechny deposit, some of these indicator parameters are compatible with the hydrogenic Fe-Mn mineral formation [117][118][119] suggesting that, at least locally in the LKR, a limited hydrogenic (seawater) component was also involved in the ore formation process [68].…”