2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical effects of oxidation products and framboidal pyrite oxidation in acid mine drainage prediction techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conversion factor is determined from the stoichiometry of the pyrite oxidation (Equation 1). Further details of these tests have been reported previously (IWRI and EGi, 2002;Weber et al, 2004). Results are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Net Acid Production Potentialmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This conversion factor is determined from the stoichiometry of the pyrite oxidation (Equation 1). Further details of these tests have been reported previously (IWRI and EGi, 2002;Weber et al, 2004). Results are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Net Acid Production Potentialmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Argon purged leach test To determine the readily available soluble sulfate acidity (SA) present in the sample due to oxidation of pyrite, an argon purged deionized water leach (Weber et al, 2004) was conducted on samples that had paste pH values < pH 7.0. It is assumed that minimal O 2 -induced pyrite oxidation would occur under these conditions (e.g., Equation 1), and likewise, minimal pyrite oxidation by Fe +3 would occur due to the circum-neutral pH values and the lack of O 2 that is needed as a terminal electron acceptor.…”
Section: Net Acid Production Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The MAP value (in kg CaCO 3 /t) was calculated according to the formula proposed by Sobek et al (1978): MAP = S (wt%) × 31.25. This calculation assumes that all S is contained in pyrite, which is a reasonable approximation (Sobek et al 1978;Weber et al 2004Hughes et al 2007). …”
Section: Standard Acid-base Accountingmentioning
confidence: 99%