1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0146-6380(98)00120-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical comparison of core extracts and oil samples in reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the maturity ratios based on aromatic hydrocarbons reveal significant differences between both sample groups. For obvious reasons Baylis (1998) was not able to obtain results in agreement with the present study. His technique, involving solvent extraction of impregnated reservoir rocks in a single step, unavoidably yielded chemical maturity data on mixtures of oil impregnations from large as well as from fine pores.…”
Section: Article In Presscontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Only the maturity ratios based on aromatic hydrocarbons reveal significant differences between both sample groups. For obvious reasons Baylis (1998) was not able to obtain results in agreement with the present study. His technique, involving solvent extraction of impregnated reservoir rocks in a single step, unavoidably yielded chemical maturity data on mixtures of oil impregnations from large as well as from fine pores.…”
Section: Article In Presscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…This is mainly due to the use of inadequate methods for the laboratory-based extraction of such rocks. The bulk compositions of solvent extracts of oil-bearing reservoir rocks obtained by the conventional techniques (involving single-step extraction of crushed and ground samples) are mostly much different from those of DST-or production oil samples recovered from equivalent stratigraphic levels (Baylis, 1998). However, the sequential flow-through extraction technique developed by Schwark et al (1997) allows discrimination of the individual oil charges present in a single sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, comparison between reservoir free and adsorbed hydrocarbons should be performed (e.g., Cao et al, 2006;George et al, 1997;Karlsen et al, 1993). This method is effective because charged oils will interact with reservoir rocks continuously; as a result, the free and adsorbed hydrocarbons would have difference if multistage petroleum charge events took place (Cao et al, 2006;Pan and Yang, 2000;Baylis, 1998;Karlsen et al, 1993). Generally, the adsorbed hydrocarbons represent those that arrive in reservoirs earlier than the free hydrocarbons (Pan and Yang, 2000;Baylis, 1998;Karlsen et al, 1993).…”
Section: Reservoir Free Hydrocarbons Vs Adsorbed Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%