2019
DOI: 10.1002/gea.21742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geoarchaeology from landscapes to material culture: Papers from the 7th Developing International Geoarchaeology conference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although GPR surveys carried out in 2010 and 2011 provided useful results (Sala et al, 2010 & 2011), there were still some anomalies of difficult interpretation, probably due to the specific features of an alluvial environment (David et al, 2008, p. 16). In those contexts, the use of geophysical methods, as part of a more complex multidisciplinary approach to get a better comprehension of subsurface stratigraphy, is a topic that geoarchaeological literature has frequently addressed (Bates & Bates, 2000; Challis & Howard, 2006, p. 231; Goldberg & Aldeias, 2018; Shillito et al, 2019 and references therein). Suggested procedures in these alluvial scenarios usually encourage the definition of hierarchical approaches in which methods for landscape visualisation and archaeological prediction are settled according to the particular scale the project requires (Challis & Howard, 2006, pp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although GPR surveys carried out in 2010 and 2011 provided useful results (Sala et al, 2010 & 2011), there were still some anomalies of difficult interpretation, probably due to the specific features of an alluvial environment (David et al, 2008, p. 16). In those contexts, the use of geophysical methods, as part of a more complex multidisciplinary approach to get a better comprehension of subsurface stratigraphy, is a topic that geoarchaeological literature has frequently addressed (Bates & Bates, 2000; Challis & Howard, 2006, p. 231; Goldberg & Aldeias, 2018; Shillito et al, 2019 and references therein). Suggested procedures in these alluvial scenarios usually encourage the definition of hierarchical approaches in which methods for landscape visualisation and archaeological prediction are settled according to the particular scale the project requires (Challis & Howard, 2006, pp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research is framed in the activity carried out by the Associazione Nazionale per gli Interessi del Mezzogiorno d'Italia (ANIMI)-Società Magna Grecia in relation to the interdisciplinary work focused on the study of archaeological sites and their environmental context, and the techniques of Geoarchaeology (Rapp & Hill, 1998;Pollard, 1999;Ghilardi & Desruelles, 2009;Shahack-Gross, 2017;Gilbert, 2017;Gençer & Turan, 2017;Leonardi, 2017;Cortéz Pérez et al, 2018;Shillito et al, 2019) have been applied in order to: 1) illustrate the geological and geomorphological setting of the POB area; 2) describe the current state of the POB, its original architectural and structural elements, and their raw materials, to identify the possible construction period; 3) establish whether the POB is the Pons Aufidi of the old Appian Way; 4) improve the knowledge on the construction techniques of Roman bridges, particularly in Campania.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%