Geo-Political Patterns of Health Care Facilities in Kogi State, Nigeria

Abstract

This study is about the distribution of health care facilities in Kogi State within the context of the geography and politics of the state. Hence, the study analyses the spatial patterns of health care facilities among the three senatorial districts (which corresponds to the division along major ethnic lines) in the state. Also, the ownership structure of facilities and the relationship between population and distribution of health care facilities in the state are analysed. The list of health care facilities and ownership in Nigeria obtained from the Department of Health Planning and Research, Federal Ministry of Health served as database for the analysis of the spatial patterns of distribution and ownership of health care facilities in Kogi State. Also, the National Population Commission's census figures provided information on the population of the State. Kogi State was stratified into the three existing senatorial districts-Kogi Central, Kogi East, and Kogi West. The total number of health care facilities and their ownership in each stratum were determined and used for the analyses. Data show that there exist inequalities in the distribution of HCFs among the various senatorial districts in the state. Kogi east senatorial district recorded the highest concentration of HCFs having 66.3% of all HCFs in the state, followed by Kogi west (19.6%) and Kogi central (14.1%). It is observed that the facility-population ratios for both PHC and SHC (1:2575 and 1:29024 respectively) are high. These proportions vary among the various senatorial districts; for example PHC-population ratios were 1:6850, 1:2746 and 1:1689 for Kogi central, west and east respectively; the ratios for SHC were 1:41,859, 1:27804 and 1:23736 for Kogi central, west and east respectively. Although, the government dominates the ownership of health care facilities in the state, her impact is heaviest in Kogi east where she owns 93% of HCFs as opposed to 70% in Kogi central where the impact is least. Kogi east which has produced the civilian Chief Executives of the state since its creation in 1991 ranks far ahead of the two other districts in the distribution of HCFs. Appropriate authorities should endeavour to achieve a more equitable distribution of health care facilities in the state, so as to engender equity and social justice.

An assessment of flood event along Lower Niger using Sentinel-1 imagery

“…The agro-climatic conditions within the state enable the cultivation of food and tree crops. The population of the state is mostly rural and the economy of the area is largely agrarian (Babatimehin et al, 2011). Fishing is carried out along rivers Niger and Benue as well as their tributaries.…”

Current realities versus theoretical optima: quantifying efficiency and sociospatial equity of travel time to hospitals in low-income and middle-income countries

“…Friedmann examined the effect of geopolitics, observing that power is concentrated in the capital cities and to a lesser extent in provincial headquarters 6. Such concentration makes urban locations the locus of political power and the homes of the elite, who often have mechanisms working to influence the process of locational and allocational decision-making to their advantage 7 8. In Nigeria, for instance, it has been argued that the location of public facilities could be affected by reasons including community monetary contributions and political considerations, such as when a commissioner or minister influences the selection of their home-town in health facility site selection 9.…”

Patterns of Patient Flow to Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex’s Cancer Treatment Centre, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria

“…Fortunately, however, the healthcare environment can be easily characterised on the basis of the nature of healthcare services (Bretthauer, Côté, 1998). Resources and persons are not equally distributed in space and for obvious reasons of economic viability and politics, the rural areas are disadvantaged in the distribution of facilities like hospitals (Babatimehin, 2013). However, increasing access to quality healthcare services in rural areas might reduce the pressure on the secondary and tertiary hospitals mostly located in cities.…”