2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genuine and drug-induced synesthesia: A comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
2
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, it is plausible that drug-induced synaesthesia-like experiences are superficially similar to, but qualitatively distinct from, congenital synaesthesia and thus should not be expected to meet standard criteria for the latter. The present results are consistent with this interpretation and the related claim that the mechanisms and characteristics of drug-induced synaesthesia-like experiences are different from those of congenital synaesthesia (Deroy & Spence, 2013;Hubbard & Ramachandran, 2003;Sinke et al, 2012). This interpretation is perhaps further bolstered by the fact that participants were able to detect which condition they were in (see below) and yet still did not display response patterns similar to congenital synaesthetes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, it is plausible that drug-induced synaesthesia-like experiences are superficially similar to, but qualitatively distinct from, congenital synaesthesia and thus should not be expected to meet standard criteria for the latter. The present results are consistent with this interpretation and the related claim that the mechanisms and characteristics of drug-induced synaesthesia-like experiences are different from those of congenital synaesthesia (Deroy & Spence, 2013;Hubbard & Ramachandran, 2003;Sinke et al, 2012). This interpretation is perhaps further bolstered by the fact that participants were able to detect which condition they were in (see below) and yet still did not display response patterns similar to congenital synaesthetes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, a systematic review of these studies revealed that they suffered from numerous methodological limitations including the absence of placebo controls and the failure to use established behavioural measures of different features of synaesthesia including automaticity, inducer specificity, and consistency of inducerconcurrent associations (Luke & Terhune, 2013). For these reasons, controversy persists as to whether these drug-induced experiences qualify as genuine synaesthesia (Deroy & Spence, 2013;Luke & Terhune, 2013;Sinke et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three types of synesthesia -developmental, acquired, and induced -have been recognized (Grossenbacher and Lovelace, 2001;Sinke et al, 2012). Developmental synesthesias are lifelong experiences and subjects remember them back to their childhood.…”
Section: Types Of Synesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induced synesthesias are transient phenomena and are experienced temporarily in the setting of sensory deprivation or acute intoxication. Sinke et al (2012) have reviewed the phenomenologic differences between the different types of synesthesia. Some of these are discussed below.…”
Section: Types Of Synesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…perceptions in the absence of external stimuli), illusions (i.e. perceptual distortion of normal environmental stimuli), and 'pseudo-hallucinations' (hallucinations recognized by the patient not to be the result of external stimuli) [113][114][115], together with intense emotional responses and thoughts that may influence the human psyche [116].…”
Section: Clinical and Adverse Effects Of Synthetic Hallucinogensmentioning
confidence: 99%