“…In this regard, it has been noted that the residential proximity between households or groups belonging to different social classes can favour contact, but this does not necessarily reverberate in subsequent social cooperation and a positive flow of capital from the middle class to the lower class (Heringa et al, 2017). It has been observed that in urban areas with some social mix, for example, where urban renewal processes have attracted a middle class (Malheiros et al, 2013), or in areas where processes of urban decay have attracted families with fewer resources (Alves, 2017a), the symbolic and/or cultural distance associated with linguistic differences and lifestyles tends to be more important than the fact that people live nearby. This is the conclusion presented by Colomb (2007) in London where, allegedly, the mix of housing tenures, which has resulted in relative physical proximity between different socio-economic groups, does not ensure proximity in public spaces, schools, services, and shops.…”