2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gentrification and neo-rural populations in the Québec countryside: Representations of various actors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
1
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
32
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In many rural localities, urban sprawl has also increased at the expense of forestland and farmland [5]. In the meantime, newcomers from the cities have acquired significant portions of the agricultural and forested land base, which was traditionally managed by long-time residents who were economically dependent on forest exploitation and farming [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many rural localities, urban sprawl has also increased at the expense of forestland and farmland [5]. In the meantime, newcomers from the cities have acquired significant portions of the agricultural and forested land base, which was traditionally managed by long-time residents who were economically dependent on forest exploitation and farming [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consumption theory focuses on consumption and population change in rural and urban areas; individual preferences and consumption demands of gentrifiers as well as culture stays in the center of research (Guimond & Simard, 2010;Stockdale, 2010). Rural gentrification is described as consumption of nature by wealthy households, along with their importation of urban amenities to rural areas-in other words, the changing of the consumption habits in rural areas (Gosnell & Abrams, 2011).…”
Section: A Brief Discussion On Rural Gentrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researches that discuss gentrification processes in rural areas of other developed countries (Bijker et al, 2012;Guimond & Simard, 2010) and Mediterranean countries (Solana-Solana, 2010) are informative, but are limited in number and point to a significant gap in the literature. The transformation in rural areas of Turkey should, to a great extent, be discussed within the scope of suburbanization and urban sprawl pressure in metropolitan fringes (Dinçer & Enlil, 2011;Öğdül, 2013a;Çamur & Yenigül, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migrants, wanted or not, however, can hold key assets to foster economic and social developmental processes, as the literature of amenity/lifestyle migration has noted [45,[69][70][71][72][73]. Rather than retreating to futile defensive positions, locals can take an active stance in voicing their view and working with the migrants towards shared identities and goals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, migrants are capable of transforming their destination community through local-level interventions that can alter conventional social, economic, and environmental conditions. That is, migrants can bring an important economic, social, and cultural contribution to their new communities in the form of knowledge, pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors, involvement, innovation, and entrepreneurship, all of which can stimulate improvements in the community [25,44,45].…”
Section: Amenity/lifestyle Migration: Community Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%