Oxford Handbooks Online 2012
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566471.013.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gentleness and Nobility, John Rastell, c.1525–27

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daniel Wakelin has suggested, however, that as Rastell's is the only name securely attached to the interlude, we might contemplate the possibility that he was its author: 'He was on occasion a merchant trading overseas-like the play's Merchant; he was a learned humanist-like the Philosopher; he was also best known as a lawyer and a printer, and it is worth considering the play as the product of his publishing.' 51 Wakelin makes the further point, that, John Rastell being Heywood's father-in-law serves to demonstrate how 'the court was not sealed off from the rest of society'. 52 The broader case he develops is that the interlude moves beyond the debate in Medwall's play, though it is simpler in form, to consider the whole commonweal, and the grounds on which political authority should be earned.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Daniel Wakelin has suggested, however, that as Rastell's is the only name securely attached to the interlude, we might contemplate the possibility that he was its author: 'He was on occasion a merchant trading overseas-like the play's Merchant; he was a learned humanist-like the Philosopher; he was also best known as a lawyer and a printer, and it is worth considering the play as the product of his publishing.' 51 Wakelin makes the further point, that, John Rastell being Heywood's father-in-law serves to demonstrate how 'the court was not sealed off from the rest of society'. 52 The broader case he develops is that the interlude moves beyond the debate in Medwall's play, though it is simpler in form, to consider the whole commonweal, and the grounds on which political authority should be earned.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Wakelin makes the further point, that, John Rastell being Heywood's father-in-law serves to demonstrate how 'the court was not sealed off from the rest of society'. 52 The broader case he develops is that the interlude moves beyond the debate in Medwall's play, though it is simpler in form, to consider the whole commonweal, and the grounds on which political authority should be earned.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 This play and its printed playbook offer insight into the activities of John Rastell and his son-in-law John Heywood, while highlighting the forces that shaped theatrical repertory in this period, in particular performance venues, audience composition, and authorial collaboration. 28 In Rastell's first printing of the play, which likely post-dates the play's first performances, two paratextual features of the playbook simultaneously illuminate and confuse authorial identity. These two features are the portrait of a lanky man on the frontispiece and the printer's colophon that appears on the last page.…”
Section: Gentylnes and Nobylyte: A Case Study In Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%