1990
DOI: 10.1002/crq.3900070405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gentle Jeopardy: The further endangerment of battered women and children in custody mediation

Abstract: This article addresses the debate over mediation as an alternative to litigation by reviewing the literature on custody mediation in the context of domestic violence and by examining the “fit” between the process of mediation and domestic violence participants. The evidence shows that mandatory custody mediation is inappropriate in the context of wife abuse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
7

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
61
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Other scholars, however, argue that mediation is neither effective nor safe to use in relationships where IPA exists (e.g., Beck & Frost, 2006; Dalton, Carbon, & Olesen, 2003; Hart, 1990; Imbrogno & Imbrogno, 2000; Jaffe et al, 2003; Johnson, Saccuzzo, & Koen, 2005; Pearson, 1997; Salem & Dunford-Jackson, 2008; Tishler, Bartholomae, & Katz, 2004). The underlying assumptions of mediation are that cooperation between the parties is attainable, that there is little to no abuse among the parties, and that each party can adequately argue for his or her needs—erroneous assumptions when IPA exists (Beck & Frost, 2006; Johnson et al, 2005; Tishler et al, 2004).…”
Section: Family Court’s Role In Determining Abusers’ Access To Mothermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other scholars, however, argue that mediation is neither effective nor safe to use in relationships where IPA exists (e.g., Beck & Frost, 2006; Dalton, Carbon, & Olesen, 2003; Hart, 1990; Imbrogno & Imbrogno, 2000; Jaffe et al, 2003; Johnson, Saccuzzo, & Koen, 2005; Pearson, 1997; Salem & Dunford-Jackson, 2008; Tishler, Bartholomae, & Katz, 2004). The underlying assumptions of mediation are that cooperation between the parties is attainable, that there is little to no abuse among the parties, and that each party can adequately argue for his or her needs—erroneous assumptions when IPA exists (Beck & Frost, 2006; Johnson et al, 2005; Tishler et al, 2004).…”
Section: Family Court’s Role In Determining Abusers’ Access To Mothermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several scholars have argued that mediators are unable to identify IPA, let alone equalize power imbalances (e.g., Hart, 1990). Subtle behaviors such as “a look” or a word that appears innocuous to an outsider (e.g., the mediator) can in reality be threats of future abuse (Stark, 2007).…”
Section: Family Court’s Role In Determining Abusers’ Access To Mothermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminists and victim advocates have argued that mediation is inherently unfair and unsafe for victims of domestic abuse (Hart 1990;Robertson and Busch 1998). Nonetheless, mediation as an alternative to prosecution has, overall, continued to expand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other researchers and practitioners argue that in couples where IPA is present, mediation should always be avoided (Astor, 1994;Hart, 1990;N. E. Johnson, Saccuzzo, & Koen, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%