2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0954394507070081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation

Abstract: Structural priming refers to the process whereby the use of a syntactic structure in an utterance functions as a prime on a subsequent utterance, such that that same structure is repeated. This article investigates this phenomenon from the perspective of first-person singular subject expression in Spanish. Two dialects and two genres of spoken Spanish are studied: New Mexican narratives and Colombian Spanish conversation. An analysis of 2,000 verbs occurring with first-person singular subjects reveals that sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

24
154
3
20

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
24
154
3
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the constraint hierarchy found in Xalapa with (a) grammatical person and number of the subject and (b) prior subject's grammatical person and number being the strongest internal predictors is largely consonant with findings around the Hispanic World including Barranquilla, Colombia (Orozco 2015); Los Angeles (Silva-Corvalán 1982, 1997); Madrid, (Enríquez 1984); Mexico City (Lastra & Martín Butragueño 2015); Puerto Rico (Cameron 1993(Cameron , 1995; New York City , Rivera, Uruguay (Carvalho & Bessett 2015); and Yucatan, Mexico (Michnowicz 2015); inter alia. This finding corroborates that despite varying pronominal rates at the surface level, the grammar underlying SPE across varieties remains essentially the same (Cameron 1993;Michnowicz 2015;Travis 2007;Torres Cacoullos & Travis 2010). A detailed discussion of the effects of the predictors conditioning SPE in Xalapa follows.…”
Section: Research Questions and Hypothesissupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the constraint hierarchy found in Xalapa with (a) grammatical person and number of the subject and (b) prior subject's grammatical person and number being the strongest internal predictors is largely consonant with findings around the Hispanic World including Barranquilla, Colombia (Orozco 2015); Los Angeles (Silva-Corvalán 1982, 1997); Madrid, (Enríquez 1984); Mexico City (Lastra & Martín Butragueño 2015); Puerto Rico (Cameron 1993(Cameron , 1995; New York City , Rivera, Uruguay (Carvalho & Bessett 2015); and Yucatan, Mexico (Michnowicz 2015); inter alia. This finding corroborates that despite varying pronominal rates at the surface level, the grammar underlying SPE across varieties remains essentially the same (Cameron 1993;Michnowicz 2015;Travis 2007;Torres Cacoullos & Travis 2010). A detailed discussion of the effects of the predictors conditioning SPE in Xalapa follows.…”
Section: Research Questions and Hypothesissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, continuity of a given subject manifested by a subject with the same person and number as its predecessor promotes null subjects while a change in person and/or number favors overt pronominal subjects. These findings confirm that the presence of one form or structure motivates the occurrence of subsequently higher frequencies of the same forms or structures (Bayley & PeaseÁlvarez 1997;Cameron & Schwenter 2013:476;Flores-Ferrán 2002;Shin & Otheguy 2009:128;Travis 2005bTravis , 2007Torres Cacoullos & Travis 2015; among others). Moreover, these results further inform our collective knowledge of the effects of both switch reference and priming since a referential switch goes hand in hand with a change in grammatical subject.…”
Section: Grammatical Person and Number Of The Subjectsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Las explicaciones van desde la necesidad de establecer contrastes, recuperar la identidad de los referentes o introducir nuevos referentes, hasta el requerimiento de especificar el significado léxico asociado a un referente no interactuante o el de asignar estatus "topical" a algún elemento (p. ej. Comajoan 2006, Silva-Corvalán 1984, 2003, Travis 2007. Desde la LSF, estos patrones podrían vincularse a sistemas de opciones motivados por otras metafunciones, tanto en el estrato lexicogramatical como en el estrato semántico-discursivo (p. ej.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified