1930
DOI: 10.1007/bf01741354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypische Asymmetrien

Abstract: Bei den meisten Erblichkeitsuntersuchungen, welche bisher ausgefiihrt worden sind, hat man haupts~chlich das Vorhandensein und das Fehlen yon Eigenschaften diskutiert. Man hat berechnet, ein wie grofler Prozentsatz yon Individuen innerhalb eines gewissen Materials eine bestimmte Eigenschaft gehabt oder nieht gehabt hat. Und man hat die gefundenen Verh~ltniszahlen nit jenen verglichen, die man nach den Voraussetzungen des Mendelismus zu erwarten gehabt h~tte. Erst in letzterer Zeit hat man begonnen, sich mehr f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1931
1931
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards the primary link in the working hypothesis mentioned above, viz, that in respect of genes, monozygotic twins are identically equipped this presumption, also, has been subjected to doubt by Dahlberg (1930), Bottleneck (1934) and Newman, Freeman and Holzinger (1937) among others. The above mentioned authors, although with slightly differing formulation, attribute conclusive significance to the so-called "asymmetry phenomenon" as a theoretically possible source of error in the twin method and thus for its basic foundation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the primary link in the working hypothesis mentioned above, viz, that in respect of genes, monozygotic twins are identically equipped this presumption, also, has been subjected to doubt by Dahlberg (1930), Bottleneck (1934) and Newman, Freeman and Holzinger (1937) among others. The above mentioned authors, although with slightly differing formulation, attribute conclusive significance to the so-called "asymmetry phenomenon" as a theoretically possible source of error in the twin method and thus for its basic foundation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%