2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotyping of rubella virus RNA in sera and dried blood spots collected during routine surveillance and in archival sera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, although sera are not optimal specimens for viral detection due to the low amounts of viral RNA present, RuV RNA was detected in 21.5% of IgM positive serum samples collected close to symptom onset, while genotypes were obtained from 7.5%. These numbers are in good agreement with a previous study of RuV RNA in sera in which 26% of sera samples were real-time PCR positive and 12% yielded genotypes [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, although sera are not optimal specimens for viral detection due to the low amounts of viral RNA present, RuV RNA was detected in 21.5% of IgM positive serum samples collected close to symptom onset, while genotypes were obtained from 7.5%. These numbers are in good agreement with a previous study of RuV RNA in sera in which 26% of sera samples were real-time PCR positive and 12% yielded genotypes [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is clear, however, that a shift occurred in the RuV genotypes over time from genotypes that were common in other European countries (1E and 1G) to the 2B genotype that was previously found primarily in other parts of the eastern hemisphere [ 1 ]. Such genotype shifts have been documented in other countries such as China [ 35 ] and Brazil [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Nevertheless, 18% of sera contained detectable rubella RNA and 8% yielded genotypes. This success rate is consistent with previous reports of genotyping rubella virus from archival serum (Zheng et al, 18% RT‐PCR‐positive and 7.8% genotyped; Lazar et al, 21.5% RT‐PCR positive and 7.5% genotyped) providing additional evidence that this is an effective method for retrospective genotype baseline determination for rubella virus . Zheng et al were able to obtain genotypes 1C, 1E, and 1G using these methods implying that this method is able to identify other rubella genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These requirements are often hard to achieve through the routine surveillance for measles and rubella. Alternative samples such as serum have been shown to provide molecular virological data retrospectively and are a potential source of baseline data on the genetic diversity of the rubella viruses in the prevaccine era. Rubella virus RNA may be detected in acute phase serum specimens (0‐3 days from rash onset) that are rubella IgM‐positive by using the polymerase chain reaction and positive samples can be genotyped …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequences from this study were aligned and analyzed together with 32 rubella virus reference strains recommended by WHO. RV sequences previously found in CIV in 2008, as well as sequences found in other African countries such as Uganda, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and Nigeria (exported to the United States), were also added to this analysis. The accuracy of the groupings was assessed using the bootstrap method with 1000 replicates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%