2012
DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2012.05.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotyping‐by‐Sequencing for Plant Breeding and Genetics

Abstract: Rapid advances in "next-generation" DNA sequencing technology have brought the US$1000 human (Homo sapiens) genome within reach while providing the raw sequencing output for researchers to revolutionize the way populations are genotyped. To capitalize on these advancements, genotypingby-sequencing (GBS) has been developed as a rapid and robust approach for reduced-representation sequencing of multiplexed samples that combines genome-wide molecular marker discovery and genotyping. The fl exibility and low cost … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
667
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 734 publications
(704 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
667
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the introduction of genomic selection with emphases on large selection intensity, coupled with SE is expected to produce gains far exceeding those obtained through traditional breeding (El-Kassaby; unpublished). Costs for whole-genome sequencing and genotyping have dropped almost exponentially over the past 10 years (Poland and Rife 2012), yet phenotyping for important wood characteristics is still tedious and costly (Porth et al 2013b). With traditional tree breeding, every single tested tree requires phenotyping, with genomic selection, only a fraction needs to be phenotyped for the proper development of accurate genomic-based prediction models as progeny testing can be omitted.…”
Section: Cost Effectiveness Of Genomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the introduction of genomic selection with emphases on large selection intensity, coupled with SE is expected to produce gains far exceeding those obtained through traditional breeding (El-Kassaby; unpublished). Costs for whole-genome sequencing and genotyping have dropped almost exponentially over the past 10 years (Poland and Rife 2012), yet phenotyping for important wood characteristics is still tedious and costly (Porth et al 2013b). With traditional tree breeding, every single tested tree requires phenotyping, with genomic selection, only a fraction needs to be phenotyped for the proper development of accurate genomic-based prediction models as progeny testing can be omitted.…”
Section: Cost Effectiveness Of Genomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently the high-throughput SNP genotyping techniques based on NGS method are used to analyze the genetic diversity (Kumar et al 2012;Shirasawa et al 2016). The NGS based advanced techniques such as genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) (Elshire et al 2011;Poland and Rife 2012) and restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-Seq) have become popular choice for genetic analysis because they are low cost and flexible (Davey et al 2011) in experiment design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prices have dropped from over $5000 per sequenced Mb in 2001 to just over $0.10 per sequenced Mb in 2011 [11]. In a study that examined genomic selection in Eucalyptus, it was estimated that progeny tests performed on 20,000 individuals would cost $51 USD per seedling [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%