1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4290(99)00055-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic variation in rice grown in low fertile soils and drought-prone, rainfed lowland environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum yield achieved in individual replications of the trials presented here was 4.5 t ha -1 (Fig. 3 and 4) and the highest yields reported in the literature were also below 5 t ha -1 (Fukai 1998). Thus, the average yield potential of KDML105 in northeast Thailand and during the wet season is probably close to 4.5 t ha -1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The maximum yield achieved in individual replications of the trials presented here was 4.5 t ha -1 (Fig. 3 and 4) and the highest yields reported in the literature were also below 5 t ha -1 (Fukai 1998). Thus, the average yield potential of KDML105 in northeast Thailand and during the wet season is probably close to 4.5 t ha -1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…On-farm data with single replication per site is suited to adaptability analysis, and EI-by-treatment interaction analysis can be consistent over a number of years if certain requirements are met in a single year's trial (Hildebrand and Russell 1996;Meertens et al 2003;Fukai et al 1999;Kajiru et al 1998;Sall et al 1998). Firstly, for linear and quadratic response estimation of EI-by-treatment interaction, ten environments are recommended with four treatments in each environment (Hildebrand and Russell 1996), and the trial set-up in the current study contained ten environments with eight treatments in each environment (site).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not possible based on our study design to separate the effects of root depth and yield potential on panicle weight. However, several previous studies have shown the dominant effects of potential growth on the yield under drought (Fukai et al 1999a;Kato et al 2006c;Pantuwan et al 2002;Romyen et al 1998). Phenology and recovery growth (biomass production between the end of stress and maturity) were also related to grain yield under stress in previous studies (Fukai and Cooper 1995;Kato et al 2006c), but there was a poor relationship between panicle weight and these traits in the present study.…”
Section: Plant Water Relations and Cultivar Variation Under Rootrestrmentioning
confidence: 99%