2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4290(03)00135-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic variation for nitrogen use efficiency in Ethiopian barley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under high N conditions, a 30% difference was observed in UtE between the most efficient cultivar Tukwa and the least efficient cultivar Manley. Similarly, Sinebo et al [5] reported substantial cultivar differences in UtE that ranged from 32 to 48 kg kg −1 N for a high (115 kg N ha −1 ) fertilizer treatment. Muurinen et al [17] also observed with the application of 90 kg N ha −1 under Nordic conditions, UtEs of 41 to 48 kg kg −1 N for two-rowed, and 42 to 53 kg kg −1 N for sixrowed barley cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under high N conditions, a 30% difference was observed in UtE between the most efficient cultivar Tukwa and the least efficient cultivar Manley. Similarly, Sinebo et al [5] reported substantial cultivar differences in UtE that ranged from 32 to 48 kg kg −1 N for a high (115 kg N ha −1 ) fertilizer treatment. Muurinen et al [17] also observed with the application of 90 kg N ha −1 under Nordic conditions, UtEs of 41 to 48 kg kg −1 N for two-rowed, and 42 to 53 kg kg −1 N for sixrowed barley cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Nonetheless, studies have shown genetic differences in N recovery and utilization efficiencies of spring barley [5,6]. Barley cultivars are of different types that may affect their N uptake and utilization characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, according to the findings of , a significant influence of the CULTAN system on the duration of winter wheat vegetation cannot be assumed. Sinebo et al (2004) recorded a positive correlation between barley grain yield and the nitrogen harvest index (NHI). The nitrogen harvest index was however significantly higher only with the CULTAN treatment compared to the conventional one in the application of 200 kg N.ha -1 when the CULTAN fertilization was applied at the beginning of tillering (BBCH 22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the result of the current correlation analysis of fertilizer level with higher biomass yield and harvest index could result in higher grain yield of maize. In other similar studies, different authors also reported positive correlations among certain growth and yield parameters of maize (Loffer et al, 1985;Van Sanford and MacKown, 1986;Sinebo et al, 2004;Muurinen, 2007).…”
Section: Harvest Index (Hi)mentioning
confidence: 61%