Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02135.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic Variation and Relationships between Quality Traits and Trace Elements in Traditional and Improved Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes

Abstract: In this study, we assessed the extent of genotypic differences among rice genotypes for grain size, milling quality, cooking properties, protein, and the mineral contents of Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu in unpolished rice varieties. Further, relationship among grain quality traits and mineral contents was determined. The results showed that the visible difference could be found in the mineral contents among rice genotypes studied. The contents of Fe and Zn in traditional genotypes were significantly higher than those of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
48
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
13
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 23 QTLs for grain yield traits detected by Huang et al (2008), qTNSP2, qNFGP6/qTNSP6/qSF6 and qSF9 were located in the regions for qMn2, qCu6 and qCu9, but the allelic direction for mineral contents was opposite to the yield traits. Unfavorable relationships between yield traits and grain mineral contents have also been reported in other studies (Anandan et al 2011). These suggest that O. rufipogon alleles beneficial to some traits may sometimes have deleterious effects on other traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the 23 QTLs for grain yield traits detected by Huang et al (2008), qTNSP2, qNFGP6/qTNSP6/qSF6 and qSF9 were located in the regions for qMn2, qCu6 and qCu9, but the allelic direction for mineral contents was opposite to the yield traits. Unfavorable relationships between yield traits and grain mineral contents have also been reported in other studies (Anandan et al 2011). These suggest that O. rufipogon alleles beneficial to some traits may sometimes have deleterious effects on other traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Modern rice cultivars have lower mineral nutrient contents in their grains (Anandan et al 2011), because breeders have constantly pursued high yields in rice and have paid little attention to nutritional quality. Wild species of rice are highly diversified and contain genes that confer valuable qualitative and quantitative traits and thus offer an important gene pool of allelic variation for rice improvement (Tanksley and McCouch 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, mineral concentrations (e.g., Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn) in maize grain are relatively low when compared to animal food products (Wang et al 2003). The concentration even decreased in the past decades due to breeders selecting exclusively for grain yield but not grain quality (Fan et al 2008;Šimic et al 2009;Anandan et al 2011). Thus, since the concentration of these dietary minerals in maize grain is not sufficient to meet the dietary requirement of humans' daily intake when these foods are consumed in typical amounts, improving the mineral concentration in maize grain is of great interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation might be due to prolonged uptake of nutrients from soil and also due to differential ability of genotypes for absorbing and accumulating micronutrients (Anandan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Dry Matter Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%