2017
DOI: 10.5897/jpbcs2016.0618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrids) clones for sucrose content in western Kenya

Abstract: Sugarcane variety development programmes primarily envisage breeding of varieties with high cane yields and high sugar content in specific environmental conditions. Key components associated with sugar yields are tonnes of cane per hectare and sucrose content. A study was undertaken to evaluate 22 introduced sugarcane genotypes with three checks (KEN 83-737, EAK73-335 and D8484) for sucrose content in western Kenya. The experiment was planted in a Latin square design with three replications at three sites name… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such biometrics characters correlate directly with yield, which means that superior biometric characteristics imply high sucrose accumulation in the sugarcane. Here, high sucrose content is a desirable component in sugarcane stalks (Shikanda et al, 2017), and its stability such as 1 st and 2 nd ratooning plantations determines the superiority. This study aimed to evaluate the stability of the yield component of ratooning sugarcane resulting from mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such biometrics characters correlate directly with yield, which means that superior biometric characteristics imply high sucrose accumulation in the sugarcane. Here, high sucrose content is a desirable component in sugarcane stalks (Shikanda et al, 2017), and its stability such as 1 st and 2 nd ratooning plantations determines the superiority. This study aimed to evaluate the stability of the yield component of ratooning sugarcane resulting from mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%