2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01885.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic diversity and migration of clonal lineages of Botrytis cinerea from chickpea fields of Bangladesh inferred by microsatellite markers

Abstract: An analysis of allelic diversity at nine microsatellite loci provided an insight into the population structure of Botrytis cinerea from four fields (sampled in 2003 and 2004) that represented important regional locations for chickpea production in Bangladesh. Although three populations were limited by sample size after clone-correction, a total of 51 alleles were amplified among 146 B. cinerea isolates from Bangladesh, which revealed a high amount of within-population and overall genetic diversity ( H S = 0·48… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from 20 runs for each K were visualized in CLUMPAK (Kopelman et al 2015). Each isolate was assigned to a given cluster when the proportion of its genome in that cluster (q K ) was higher than an arbitrary cut-off value of 80% (Liu et al 2003;Fukunaga et al 2005;Isenegger et al 2008;Vigouroux et al 2008). Isolates that could not meet the arbitrary cut-off were assigned to the 'admixed' group.…”
Section: Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from 20 runs for each K were visualized in CLUMPAK (Kopelman et al 2015). Each isolate was assigned to a given cluster when the proportion of its genome in that cluster (q K ) was higher than an arbitrary cut-off value of 80% (Liu et al 2003;Fukunaga et al 2005;Isenegger et al 2008;Vigouroux et al 2008). Isolates that could not meet the arbitrary cut-off were assigned to the 'admixed' group.…”
Section: Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Isenegger et al. ; Váczy et al. ), clone mates were identified by calculating the probability ( P GEN ) of each multilocus genotype (MLG) arising through sexual instead of clonal reproduction using the software genclone V2.0 (Arnaud‐Haond and Belkhir ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the resistant chickpea lines such as ICC1069, P349-2 and NEC2451 have been widely used in breeding (Haware et al 1992;Chaturvedi et al 1995) but higher levels of host resistance still need to be identified . Furthermore, these resistances are unlikely to hold in the longer term as pathogen diversity indicates likely breakdown of host resistance (Isenegger et al 2008). …”
Section: Breeding For Fungal Disease Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. cinerea isolates collected from India and Nepal have been differentiated based on their morphocultural characters and effects on different chickpea genotypes (Singh and Bhan 1986;Rewal and Grewal 1989a, b;. Nine simple sequence repeat markers were used on B. cinerea (Fournier et al 2002) to study population structure of a total of 51 alleles were amplified among 146 B. cinerea isolates of chickpea from Bangladesh, India and Nepal, which revealed a high amount of within-population and overall genetic diversity (Isenegger et al 2005(Isenegger et al , 2008. Different methods have been applied to screen germplasm for BGM resistance under in vitro, greenhouse and field conditions (Pande et al 2002(Pande et al , 2006aGurha et al 2003).…”
Section: Breeding For Fungal Disease Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%