1979
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1979.00021962007100050038x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic Differences of Corn for Ion Uptake1

Abstract: Efficiency of fertilizer uptake may be improved by selecting genotypes that absorb a greater proportion of the nutrients in the soil. The objective of this investigation was to examine genotypic differences in ion influx (uptake rate per cm of root) properties of corn (Zea mays L.) roots that may influence efficiency of fertilizer uptake. Six genotypes developed in Florida and six genotypes developed in Indiana were investigated. Each represented two single‐cross hybrids and their parents. They were grown for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Table 4). Baligar & Barber (1979), in a study with several maize genotypes, observed that the genotype with the highest values for Vmax and Km presented the lowest Cmin and root length. The relationships between the Puptake kinetic parameters and the root dimension characters were not uniform for all evaluated genotypes, in accordance to the results found in the present experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Table 4). Baligar & Barber (1979), in a study with several maize genotypes, observed that the genotype with the highest values for Vmax and Km presented the lowest Cmin and root length. The relationships between the Puptake kinetic parameters and the root dimension characters were not uniform for all evaluated genotypes, in accordance to the results found in the present experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such variability in maize genotypes, and in other plant species, has been considered as a plant adaptation alternative to the higher or lower soil P availability, since this nutrient moves from soil to root surface by diffusion, a process which depends strongly on physical and chemical soil atributes (Nielsen & Barber, 1978;Baligar & Barber, 1979;Schenk & Barber, 1979a, 1979b1980;Anghinoni et al, 1989;Alves et al, 1998;Ciarelli et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Manipulating the genotypic differences in crop cultivars to adapt them to adverse soil conditions such as low nutrients status is one of the key strategies for the sustainable intensification of agricultural systems (Yang et al, 2004a). Genotypic differences in K use efficiency have been reported in various crops, e.g., alfalfa (James et al, 1995), snapbean (Shea et al, 1968), soybean (Sale and Campbell, 1987), tomato (Chen and Gabelman, 1995), ramie (Liu et al, 2000), corn (Baligar and Barber, 1979), wheat (Zhang et al, 1999) and barley (Pettersson and Jensén, 1983). Genetic variation also exists in rice in low K soils (Liu et al, 1987;Yang et al, 2003;2004b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corn hybrids differ significantly in N accumulation patterns including: total N uptake, N uptake before silking and N uptake after silking (Rhoades and Stanley, 1981). Genetic differences may be due to root morphology and ion uptake (Baligar and Barber, 1979;Pace and McClure, 1986) or utilization of N in the plant (Anderson et al, 1984;Beauchamp et al, 1976;Moll et al, 1982;Pollmer et al, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%