2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic differences between strains of the opportunistic pathogen Corynebacterium bovis isolated from humans, cows, and rodents

Abstract: Corynebacterium bovis is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen shown to cause eye and prosthetic joint infections as well as abscesses in humans, mastitis in dairy cattle, and skin disease in laboratory mice and rats. Little is known about the genetic characteristics and genomic diversity of C. bovis because only a single draft genome is available for the species. The overall aim of this study was to sequence and compare the genome of C. bovis isolates obtained from different species, locations, and time points.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4A). In the COG analysis, “information storage and processing” includes RNA processing and modification, chromosome dynamics, translation, transcription, replication, recombination, and repair 35 . The function of COGs with “information storage and processing” might be associated with intracellular survival 36 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4A). In the COG analysis, “information storage and processing” includes RNA processing and modification, chromosome dynamics, translation, transcription, replication, recombination, and repair 35 . The function of COGs with “information storage and processing” might be associated with intracellular survival 36 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,18,49 Using whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomic analyses, we recently reported on the genetic diversity of 21 C. bovis isolates obtained from various hosts, geographical locations, and time points. 3,4,8,21,36,37,57,61 Genotypic differences between isolates, including the number of associated virulence factors, reflected the host from which they were obtaineds. 8,19 Analyses using the PHAST (Phage Search Tool) and PHASTER (Phage Search Tool Enhanced Release) algorithms failed to identify the presence of intact or true (completeness score greater than 90) or questionable (completeness score, 70 to 90) phage in any of the isolates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,8,21,36,37,57,61 Genotypic differences between isolates, including the number of associated virulence factors, reflected the host from which they were obtaineds. 8,19 Analyses using the PHAST (Phage Search Tool) and PHASTER (Phage Search Tool Enhanced Release) algorithms failed to identify the presence of intact or true (completeness score greater than 90) or questionable (completeness score, 70 to 90) phage in any of the isolates. 1,64 Both PHAST and PHASTER are used to identify, annotate, and graphically display prophage sequences within bacterial genomes or plasmids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations