2018
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic and Phenotypic Diversity of Cryptococcus gattii VGII Clinical Isolates and Its Impact on Virulence

Abstract: The Cryptococcus gattii species complex harbors the main etiological agents of cryptococcosis in immunocompetent patients. C. gattii molecular type VGII predominates in the north and northeastern regions of Brazil, leading to high morbidity and mortality rates. C. gattii VGII isolates have a strong clinical relevance and phenotypic variations. These phenotypic variations among C. gattii species complex isolates suggest that some strains are more virulent than others, but little information is available related… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(103 reference statements)
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our current study showed that C. gattii species complex infection in Guangxi, southern China were caused by both C. gattii s.s. (AFLP4/VGI) and C. deuterogattii (AFLP6/VGII), with different MLST genotypes and virulence factor characteristics. Similar pattern has also been reported in other countries such as Canada, Brazil, Australia and the USA [29][30][31]. Although C. deuterogattii in this study was genetically indistinguishable from the outbreak genotypes AFLP6A/VGIIa (R265) and AFLP6C/VGIIc (A6M-R38), they were related to other global C. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008493.g003…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our current study showed that C. gattii species complex infection in Guangxi, southern China were caused by both C. gattii s.s. (AFLP4/VGI) and C. deuterogattii (AFLP6/VGII), with different MLST genotypes and virulence factor characteristics. Similar pattern has also been reported in other countries such as Canada, Brazil, Australia and the USA [29][30][31]. Although C. deuterogattii in this study was genetically indistinguishable from the outbreak genotypes AFLP6A/VGIIa (R265) and AFLP6C/VGIIc (A6M-R38), they were related to other global C. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008493.g003…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since certain strains were able to mate in vitro, we also studied and compared their virulence factors to the standard reference strain (R265). Melanin production, and capsule formation were evaluated using slightly modified protocols that were published previously [29][30][31]. Visual analysis of melanin production was performed on caffeic acid agar; strains were grown on agar plates incubated at 30˚C and 37˚C for 72 h and observed the appearance of brown yeast colonies.…”
Section: Mating Type Determination and Physiological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main differences between both models is the duration of the experiments, with the Galleria model cutting down the time to less than two weeks, while the mouse model takes almost two months (Figure 3). Similarly, larval tissue damage was more evident in larvae inoculated with high-virulence strains, as seen previously in murine models, in which rodents inoculated with strains of higher virulence presented a higher fungal burden [31][32][33]. Skeletal damage at the tissue level and nodular lesions consist typically of an accumulation of yeast masses that can be observed causing tissue disorganization, which resembles the formation of granulomas or lesions in the brain parenchyma in pulmonary or meningeal cryptococcosis, respectively [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, apart from studying the pathophysiology of different fungal species, more recently, this invertebrate model has been successfully used for testing the in vivo efficacy of conventional and novel antifungal drugs [27]. In the case of Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii, several approaches using mainly vertebrate but also invertebrate models have been used to study fungal pathogenicity [10,[28][29][30][31][32][33], recognize genes involved in pathogenicity, identify strain virulence, virulence factors (including capsule, melanin production and biofilm formation), and undertake antifungal susceptibility testing of existing and new compounds [34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable variation in virulence-associated traits and antifungal drug resistance both within and between Cryptococcus species (Barchiesi et al, 2005;Litvintseva and Mitchell, 2009;Mukaremera et al, 2019;Martinez et al, 2001;Sun et al, 2014;Small and Mitchell, 1989;Barcellos et al, 2018;Samarasinghe et al, 2018;Hagen et al, 2016;Matos et al, 2018). One of the most powerful approaches for dissecting the genetic basis of phenotypic variation is quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping (Lander and Botstein, 1989;Lynch and Walsh, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%