2018
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype‐specific fitness cost of resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in pink bollworm

Abstract: Our genotype-specific cost estimates and the results of studies discussed herein indicate that costs associated with resistance to Bt are often large enough to significantly delay the evolution of resistance to pyramided Bt crops in pests with recessive inheritance of resistance. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(197 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the observed number of 19 r1r1 individuals is 79 times higher than the expected number ( P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test), which implies strong selection favoring this allele. However, in an analysis of allele trajectories in heterogeneous strains from the U.S. reared on untreated diet, the fitness cost was not lower for r1 than r2 or r3 . This result does not support the hypothesis of a relatively low fitness cost in the absence of Cry1Ac contributing to the higher frequency of r1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the observed number of 19 r1r1 individuals is 79 times higher than the expected number ( P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test), which implies strong selection favoring this allele. However, in an analysis of allele trajectories in heterogeneous strains from the U.S. reared on untreated diet, the fitness cost was not lower for r1 than r2 or r3 . This result does not support the hypothesis of a relatively low fitness cost in the absence of Cry1Ac contributing to the higher frequency of r1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In India, however, this pest evolved practical resistance to Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac alone, then to dual‐toxin Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab . In the U.S. and China, pink bollworm has not evolved practical resistance to Cry1Ac in the field, but laboratory selection of insects from each country has yielded many strains resistant to Cry1Ac, indicating the potential for field‐evolved resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AZP‐R, derived from 10 populations collected in Arizona cotton fields in 1997, has 1500‐3100‐fold resistance to Cry1Ac originally conferred by three cadherin alleles named r 1 , r 2 and r 3 . Whereas all three cadherin alleles were initially present in AZP‐R, only the r2 allele currently exists in this strain due to fitness costs associated with the r1 and r3 alleles and continuous long‐term laboratory rearing . APHIS‐R is a new strain derived by the mass selection of APHIS‐S on diet containing a discriminating concentration of Cry1Ac (10 μg per mL diet) in October 2017.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,45,46 Whereas all three cadherin alleles were initially present in AZP-R, only the r2 allele currently exists in this strain due to fitness costs associated with the r1 and r3 alleles and continuous long-term laboratory rearing. 47 APHIS-R is a new strain derived by the mass selection of APHIS-S on diet containing a discriminating concentration of Cry1Ac (10 μg per mL diet) in October 2017. Survivors from the initial selection (∼200 rr pupae) were pooled and maintained on laboratory diet in environmental chambers under standard rearing conditions (26 ∘ C; 14:10 light:dark photoperiod).…”
Section: Insect Strains and Rearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, genes in our putative sweep regions may allow for recovery of fitness in individuals bearing mutations with otherwise deleterious effects. Many insecticide resistance mutations are thought to negatively impact fitness in the absence of insecticide pressure (Kliot and Ghanim, 2012), and Bt resistance mutations are no exception (Gassmann et al, 2009; Carrière et al, 2018b). Perhaps selection for a mutation that conferred resistance in GA-R was followed by selection for mutations that improve the fitness of individuals bearing such a mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%