2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.100589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype-phenotype associations in Fanconi anemia: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
159
3
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
159
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…FA-A is the most common complementation group and covers 65% of patients. 15 Consistent with this report FA-A is the most common complementation group (78.2%) in our study. Frequency of other groups were consistent with previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…FA-A is the most common complementation group and covers 65% of patients. 15 Consistent with this report FA-A is the most common complementation group (78.2%) in our study. Frequency of other groups were consistent with previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…FA usually manifests early in life with congenital anomalies involving many organ systems, progressive BMF and a very high risk for the development of MDS, AML, head and neck carcinomas, as well as multiple other cancer types. A number of comprehensive studies and reviews on FA and FA-associated cancers have been published elsewhere (82)(83)(84)(85).…”
Section: Syndromes Caused By Faulty Double-stranded Break Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 These syndromes include inherited causes of trilineage bone marrow aplasia such as Fanconi anemia (FA) and telomere biology disorders, as well as diseases associated with single lineage failure such as Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA), congenital neutropenias, and inherited thrombocytopenias. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] They also include recently described disorders such as GATA2 haploinsufficiency and SAMD9/SAMD9L syndromes, which have variable impacts on hematopoietic function but carry a high risk of MDS transformation. [13][14][15] IBMF and hematologic malignancy predisposition syndromes have widely variable phenotypes and penetrance, even within families, making prognostic counseling of patients and families difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%