1987
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.112.3.579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype × Environment Interactions in Sweet Potato Yield and Quality Factors

Abstract: Genotype (G) x environment (E) interactions were measured in sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas L.) for yield (seven genotypes, six locations, 3 years) and selected quality factors (nine genotypes, six locations, 2 years). Yield of all grades of roots and all quality factors tested were affected significantly by genotype, environment, and G × E interactions. Quality factors were less affected by G × E interactions than yield factors. Broad-sense heritability estimates ranged from 75% to 92% for yield factors and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across both years and all yield parameters, USDA-17-037 and USDA-17-077 consistently yielded the highest, with USDA-17-077 yielding significantly greater than the control cultivars. Yield in sweetpotato is highly variable, and furthermore, storage root formation in high-yielding cultivars can be strongly influenced by environment (Collins et al 1987; Manrique and Hermann 2000). The differences observed among weed-free intervals in 2018 could be due to differences in rainfall amount received each year during the trial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across both years and all yield parameters, USDA-17-037 and USDA-17-077 consistently yielded the highest, with USDA-17-077 yielding significantly greater than the control cultivars. Yield in sweetpotato is highly variable, and furthermore, storage root formation in high-yielding cultivars can be strongly influenced by environment (Collins et al 1987; Manrique and Hermann 2000). The differences observed among weed-free intervals in 2018 could be due to differences in rainfall amount received each year during the trial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%