2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype × environment interaction and selection of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids across moisture regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, less, the variation due to the environment, including differences in rainfall and temperature, led to inconsistent performance of finger millet genotypes in the North Coastal Region of the state. In contrast to our results, a large proportion of total variation contributed by the environment was reported in finger millet in the studies by Adugna et al (2011), Molla et al (2013), Dagnachew et al (2014); Birhanu et al (2016), Lakew et al (2017), andSeyoum et al (2019) whereas the studies by Dehghani et al (2006), Tolessa et al (2013), andSingamsetti et al (2021) unraveled GEI among the genotypes of field pea, wheat, and maize, respectively. The procedure of AMMI included the partitioning of GEI by PCs, followed by the significance of the interaction was measured by Gollob's F-test.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, less, the variation due to the environment, including differences in rainfall and temperature, led to inconsistent performance of finger millet genotypes in the North Coastal Region of the state. In contrast to our results, a large proportion of total variation contributed by the environment was reported in finger millet in the studies by Adugna et al (2011), Molla et al (2013), Dagnachew et al (2014); Birhanu et al (2016), Lakew et al (2017), andSeyoum et al (2019) whereas the studies by Dehghani et al (2006), Tolessa et al (2013), andSingamsetti et al (2021) unraveled GEI among the genotypes of field pea, wheat, and maize, respectively. The procedure of AMMI included the partitioning of GEI by PCs, followed by the significance of the interaction was measured by Gollob's F-test.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The significant GEN×ME×YEAR interaction suggests the complex interaction of the genotypes with contrasting environments on the trait phenotypic expression. Similar reports were also observed in previous studies ( Kamutando et al., 2013 ; Mebratu et al., 2019 ; Yue et al., 2020 ; Singamsetti et al., 2021 ). Along with the global changes in climatic variables over the past decades, there is a growing consensus that future food production will be threatened by environmental conditions ( Ceglar and Kajfež-Bogataj, 2012 ; Steward et al., 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…During breeding practice, breeders often measure many traits related to yield and are faced with the problem of selecting stable and superior genotypes based on multiple traits. The multi-trait stability index (MTSI) has been successfully used for selecting superior genotypes based on multiple traits ( Koundinya et al., 2021 ; Singamsetti et al., 2021 ; Farhad et al., 2022 ; Lima et al., 2022 ; Padmaja et al., 2022 ), and has a tremendous potential to combine morpho-physiological and yield traits aiming at selecting hybrids under optimal and stress conditions ( Balbaa et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain yield is the most important trait in maize; however, this character is polygenic and sensitive to the exposed environmental changes (Acquaah, 2007). Under waterlogging stress, the low to moderate heritability estimates have been noticed (Edmeades et al, 1999) and the genotype by environment interaction (GEI) becomes greater for maize grain yield (Singamsetti et al, 2021). The purpose of the adaptation test is to determine the genetic potential and adaptability of candidate varieties in the targeted environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%