1974
DOI: 10.1080/00071667408416077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype by type of housing interaction in populations of white Leghorns under reciprocal recurrent selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to chance, these differences may be caused by bias in prediction or in estimated environmental trends. Predicted and estimated genetic changes for two generations of response to reciprocal recurrent selection in White Leghorn strains for multiple objectives were presented by von Krosigk et al (1973). Their results showed good agreement between predicted and estimated response, although estimated response may have been biased by relaxed selection effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition to chance, these differences may be caused by bias in prediction or in estimated environmental trends. Predicted and estimated genetic changes for two generations of response to reciprocal recurrent selection in White Leghorn strains for multiple objectives were presented by von Krosigk et al (1973). Their results showed good agreement between predicted and estimated response, although estimated response may have been biased by relaxed selection effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As is typical for commercial breeding programmes, there is no unselected control population or negative selection line to study cumulative rates of genetic improvement, but improvement in the commercial cross has been estimated from repeat matings (Krosigk et al, 1972) and relative to other commercial strain crosses based on random sample test data (Flock, 1988). The primary reasons for changing from strict RRS to MRRS was lack of information with regard to the pure line: cross line genetic correlations, which require testing pure line and cross line sire progeny in the same environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%