2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12892-020-00060-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype-by-trait association of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) advanced lines grown under arid and semi-arid regions of Zimbabwe

Abstract: Inadequate information is available on trait relations and profiles of sorghum genotypes, yet this information is vital for precise decisions to be undertaken in breeding programs. Here, 17 sorghum experimental lines were evaluated together with three checks at five locations, representing the major sorghum production environments in Zimbabwe. Across site analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant genotypic effects on grain yield (GYD) as well as the other traits, including panicle length (PL) and stem di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genotype by trait (GT) and genotype by yield by trait (GYT) graphical analysis are among these methods that provide graphical and clear images of trait and genotype relationships. The GT biplot analysis has been used for this purpose in some crops such as soybean (Yan & Rajcan, 2002 ), lupin (Rubio et al, 2004 ), rapeseed (Dehghani et al, 2008 ), corn (Santana et al, 2021 ; Santos et al, 2021 ; Shojaei et al, 2020 ), wheat (Zulfiqar et al, 2021 ), and sorghum (Mukondwa et al, 2021 ). A potential constraint of the GT biplot method is that it may fail to explain most of the variation and therefore fail to display all patterns of the data and this is most likely to occur with large datasets, small main effects, and complex interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genotype by trait (GT) and genotype by yield by trait (GYT) graphical analysis are among these methods that provide graphical and clear images of trait and genotype relationships. The GT biplot analysis has been used for this purpose in some crops such as soybean (Yan & Rajcan, 2002 ), lupin (Rubio et al, 2004 ), rapeseed (Dehghani et al, 2008 ), corn (Santana et al, 2021 ; Santos et al, 2021 ; Shojaei et al, 2020 ), wheat (Zulfiqar et al, 2021 ), and sorghum (Mukondwa et al, 2021 ). A potential constraint of the GT biplot method is that it may fail to explain most of the variation and therefore fail to display all patterns of the data and this is most likely to occur with large datasets, small main effects, and complex interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent approach for multitrait genotype selection combines GT biplot and yield to become a genotype by yield*trait biplot, and this method is useful to obtain information about yield relative to other breeding targets (Yan and Fregeau-Reid 2018). The GT biplot analysis has been applied to other crops such as rice (Sharifi and Ebadi 2016), sorghum (Mukondwa et al 2020), and corn (Orhun 2020;Shojaei et al 2020). Unfortunately, there has been limited study into how GT biplot analysis is used to identify potential hybrids based on corn flour nutritional values by plant breeding approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different methods, the genotype × trait (GT) and genotype × yield × trait (GYT) biplot analyses are advantageous graphical tools that prepare efficient overview of different traits and genotypes relationships. The GT biplot has previously been used in different crops to determine the association between different traits and genotypes such as rapeseed (Dehghani et al, 2008 ), sorghum (Mukondwa et al, 2021 ), corn (Santana, Flores, et al, 2021 ; Santos et al, 2021 ; Shojaei et al, 2020 ), white soybean (Yan & Rajcan, 2002 ), white lupin (Rubio et al, 2004 ), wheat (Zulfiqar et al, 2021 ), papaya (Santana, Ramos, et al, 2021 ), and tomato (Ene et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%