Genotype‐by‐Environment Interactions and Sexual Selection 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118912591.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype‐by‐Environment Interactions and Sexual Selection in Guppies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, both the direction and magnitude of sexual selection in males could change (Candolin and Heuschele ; Ingleby et al. ; Kolluru ). Another possibility is that female choice itself is condition dependent (Hunt et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, both the direction and magnitude of sexual selection in males could change (Candolin and Heuschele ; Ingleby et al. ; Kolluru ). Another possibility is that female choice itself is condition dependent (Hunt et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if male signals vary unpredictably with the environment, female choice for "good genes" may be disrupted in novel environments (Holman and Kokko 2014). As a consequence, both the direction and magnitude of sexual selection in males could change (Candolin and Heuschele 2008;Ingleby et al 2010;Kolluru 2014). Another possibility is that female choice itself is condition dependent (Hunt et al 2005;Cotton et al 2006), resulting in reduced female choosiness and relaxed intersexual selection on males in maladapted populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence from guppies reveals that traits subject to precopulatory (colour ornamentation and behaviour) and post‐copulatory sexual selection (ejaculate traits) are highly sensitive to changes in diet quantity and quality (Devigili et al ., ; Rahman et al ., , ). Indeed, there is abundant evidence that the availability of resources such as diet, among other sources of environmental variation, influences the expression of sexually selected traits in guppies (Kolluru, ). Until now, however, there has been limited support for the presence of GEI through resource limitation for sexual ornamentation in guppies (Kolluru, ), and to our knowledge, there are no tests for GEIs in any context for post‐copulatory traits in guppies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poeciliid fishes are model systems for studying sexually selected traits (Meffe & Snelson 1989;Houde 1997;Pollux et al 2009;Evans et al 2011;Kolluru 2014), yet many species have not been studied in detail (Endler 2011). Using the black morph of the endemic Cuban species G. metallicus, we demonstrated a correlation between female preference in dichotomous choice tests and male-male aggression in the open arena, suggesting that females are able to distinguish males who will subsequently be successful at aggressive competition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%