2021
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype and phenotype distribution of 435 patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease from central south China

Abstract: Background and purpose The purpose was to provide an overview of genotype and phenotype distribution in a cohort of patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease (CMT) and related disorders from central south China. Methods In all, 435 patients were enrolled and detailed clinical data were collected. Multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification for PMP22 duplication/deletion and CMT multi‐gene panel sequencing were performed. Whole exome sequencing was further applied in the remaining patients who failed to ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
23
1
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(74 reference statements)
3
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Heterozygous MFN2 variants were the primary mutations that could establish the diagnosis. The variant c.3G>T in GDAP1 changed the initiation codon, which has been reported in previous literature (21)(22)(23). The GDAP1 c.713G>T missense change occurred at the same position (p.W238) as another pathogenic variant observed (21,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Heterozygous MFN2 variants were the primary mutations that could establish the diagnosis. The variant c.3G>T in GDAP1 changed the initiation codon, which has been reported in previous literature (21)(22)(23). The GDAP1 c.713G>T missense change occurred at the same position (p.W238) as another pathogenic variant observed (21,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The prevalence of CMT1E showed a difference according to the countries studied, but there appears to be no difference by continent. The prevalence of CMT1E in Korean CMT patients was similar to that of Chinese patients [ 38 , 39 ], but it was significantly higher than that of Japanese CMT patients without CMT1A [ 44 , 45 ]. When the prevalence was compared with European populations, it was clearly higher than those of Hungarians [ 42 ] and Spaniards [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The frequencies of CMT1E with PMP22 mutations was calculated as 1.69% in the total examined CMT probands (n = 1243) and 2.47% in the CMT probands (n = 850) excluding CMT1A (Table 2). When the prevalence of total CMT patients was compared with other countries, it was roughly similar with China at 0.94-2.38% [38,39], Italy at 1.36% [40], and Brazil at 2.10% [41] while it was higher than other examined populations, such as in Hungary at 0.37% [42] and Spain at 0.46% [43]. The prevalence of CMT1E in Japanese CMT patients excluding CMT1A ranged from 0.81-1.29%, which is a considerably low frequency compared with that of Korean CMT patients [44,45].…”
Section: Prevalence Of Cmt1e In Cmt Patientsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These top three genes are comparable to the findings of several other countries; however, GJB1, rather than MFN2, is the most common in their studies. This may be related to the predominance of axonal subtypes of IPNs in the current analysis, similar to Norway, but distinct from other countries, wherein demyelinating subtypes had predominance (1.1-3.18:1) [9,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]27,29]. The reason for this phenomenon may be associated with the PMP22 CNV exclusion or as a regional characteristic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…To date, genetic spectrum studies of IPNs have been completed and updated in several countries [ 9 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. We have reviewed these reports and compared them with our findings in Table 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%