2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
274
3
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 434 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 319 publications
10
274
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1, only the high dose of MTS produced slight, but statistically significant, increases in the frequencies of MN-RETs (0.68% vs. 0.52% in controls; P = 0.03, unadjusted) and MN-NCEs (0.16% vs. 0.15% in controls; P = 0.04, unadjusted). These results confirm that MTS induces MN in the hematopoietic system, as previously shown (3,24). Conversely, neither dose of STS significantly increased the frequencies of MN-RETs or MN-NCEs with respect to control values in bone marrow and blood, respectively (using a generalized score test or ANOVA).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…1, only the high dose of MTS produced slight, but statistically significant, increases in the frequencies of MN-RETs (0.68% vs. 0.52% in controls; P = 0.03, unadjusted) and MN-NCEs (0.16% vs. 0.15% in controls; P = 0.04, unadjusted). These results confirm that MTS induces MN in the hematopoietic system, as previously shown (3,24). Conversely, neither dose of STS significantly increased the frequencies of MN-RETs or MN-NCEs with respect to control values in bone marrow and blood, respectively (using a generalized score test or ANOVA).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is known that smokers have higher levels of DNA damage in their sperm. 16 In this context, the presence of the GSTP1 enzyme in seminal fluid further substantiates its role in the protection of spermatozoa against (oxidative) damage. 40 However, our results did not reveal a significant association between the paternal GSTP1 Val105 allele, alone or in combination with paternal smoking and CL/P offspring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, the genetic background of the child is derived from both parents, whose gametes may be affected by lifestyle factors. 15 Therefore, paternal lifestyle factors, such as smoking, may generate cytotoxic effects 16 and could as such contribute to orofacial clefts in newborns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three recent studies have provided evidence that this could be the case (Hong et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2006;Dharel et al, 2006). DNA damage is just one form of genotoxic stress that cells undergo when exposed to smoke (DeMarini, 2004). Two recent papers from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences suggest that smoking and a inherently weaker p53 stress response, interact to increase the risk for developing both lung and esophageal cancers (Hong et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Stresses Such As Smoking and Chronic Hcv Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%