2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.phyplu.2021.100137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxic evaluation of the infusion of Baccharis spicata (Lam.) Baill (Asteraceae), a substitute of the medicinal plant known as “carqueja” in Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the plant infusion did not show cytotoxic effect at the evaluated concentrations on A549 and Vero cell lines at 24 hours. Previously, our group have been reported that B. spicata did not produce cytotoxicity after 72 hours of incubation in the CHO cell line (Agudelo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the plant infusion did not show cytotoxic effect at the evaluated concentrations on A549 and Vero cell lines at 24 hours. Previously, our group have been reported that B. spicata did not produce cytotoxicity after 72 hours of incubation in the CHO cell line (Agudelo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several substances present in the infusion could explain the antiviral effect observed. This infusion was previously standardized in Agudelo et al (2021), and an aliquot was employed in these assays. In the previously cited article, it was reported that 0.390 ± 0.05 mg of 5-caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA)/mL; 0.524 ± 0.07 mg of 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid (3,5-DCQA)/mL and 0.0953 ± 0.004 mg of rutin/mL were present in the infusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations