1990
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(90)90096-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxic effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on the circulating lymphocytes of breast cancer patients. II. Alteration of DNA repair and chromosome radiosensitivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference was statistically significant at the 0.01 level but may reflect the fact that only one breast cancer patient smoked cigarettes, whereas 14 women with benign masses were smokers. Frequencies of chromosome anomalies and SCE in this population were similar to those reported by others in adult women with [Rigaud et al, 1990;Tucker et al, 19901. There was no correlation between the hprt mutant frequency and either aberrations or SCE, a finding consistent with the observation of others that mutation at the hprt locus is seldom associated with karyotypic abnormalities [He et al, 19891. The mechanisms of induction of chromosome aberration and SCE may be different, and other laboratories likewise have not found strong correlations between these genetic endpoints [Wasserman et al, 1990;Swierenga et al, 1991 1.…”
Section: Chromosome Aberrations and Sister Chromatid Exchangessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This difference was statistically significant at the 0.01 level but may reflect the fact that only one breast cancer patient smoked cigarettes, whereas 14 women with benign masses were smokers. Frequencies of chromosome anomalies and SCE in this population were similar to those reported by others in adult women with [Rigaud et al, 1990;Tucker et al, 19901. There was no correlation between the hprt mutant frequency and either aberrations or SCE, a finding consistent with the observation of others that mutation at the hprt locus is seldom associated with karyotypic abnormalities [He et al, 19891. The mechanisms of induction of chromosome aberration and SCE may be different, and other laboratories likewise have not found strong correlations between these genetic endpoints [Wasserman et al, 1990;Swierenga et al, 1991 1.…”
Section: Chromosome Aberrations and Sister Chromatid Exchangessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Defects in processing the type of DNA damage induced by ionising radiation have been reported in prospective analyses of lymphocytes in a high proportion of breast cancer patients compared with healthy donors. These studies have been performed using fluorimetric analysis of alkaline DNA unwinding (Rigaud et al, 1990) or chromosomal radiosensitivity of lymphocytes irradiated in the G 2 phase of the cell cycle (Scott et al, 1994;Parshad et al, 1996;Patel et al, 1997). The increased frequency of G 2 chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients with a familial history (Parshad et al, 1996) and in first-degree relatives of breast cancer cases (Patel et al, 1997) favours a genetic origin of this defect and suggests that, besides the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, other genes with lower penetrance, involved in the processing of radiation-induced DNA damage, may predispose to breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most extensively used biomarkers for the assessment of genotoxic and carcinogenic risks evoked by cancer chemotherapy involve cytogenetic endpoints as chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges and micronuclei in mitogen-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes [9,10]. However, most of them are restricted, with the need for cell proliferation in vitro, as DNA damage must be processed into microscopically visible lesions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%