2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.07.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxic damage in pathology anatomy laboratory workers exposed to formaldehyde

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
76
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
8
76
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…After adjustment for age and other confounding factors, we found that MN frequencies from samples taken before (67 worker study) and after (67 and 178 worker studies) the workday FA exposure were significantly increased with the number of work years, consistent with the findings of Costa et al 12) and Jiang et al 11) in 48 pathology/anatomy workers and 151 plywood workers, respectively. However, in contrast to the findings of the two earlier studies by Costa et al 15) and Jiang et al…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After adjustment for age and other confounding factors, we found that MN frequencies from samples taken before (67 worker study) and after (67 and 178 worker studies) the workday FA exposure were significantly increased with the number of work years, consistent with the findings of Costa et al 12) and Jiang et al 11) in 48 pathology/anatomy workers and 151 plywood workers, respectively. However, in contrast to the findings of the two earlier studies by Costa et al 15) and Jiang et al…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…On the other hand, Ying et al 14) found that the frequencies of lymphocyte micronuclei in students did not significantly increase after exposure to 0.508 mg/m 3 FA over an 8-week period of anatomy classes. Moreover, debates about the correlation between chromosome damage and FA exposure levels are also found in the literature 15,16) . Contradictory results were also reported for DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs), another important genetic damage that has been extensively evaluated in FA-exposed rodents and mammalian cells in vitro 17−20) .…”
Section: Occupational Exposure To Formaldehyde and Genetic Damage In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymorphism of the repair genes XRCC1 and XRCC3 can contribute to increase the genetic damage in susceptible subjects with chronic exposure to cytostatic drugs (Laffon et al 2005;Cornetta et al 2008). Formaldehyde, an endogenous cellular aldehyde often used in pathology and anatomy laboratories is a well-known human mutagenic carcinogen although evidence of genotoxic effects in human PBLs is insufficient (Costa et al 2008;Jakab et al 2010). In our study a significant increase of CA yields and apoptotic capacity was observed among the exposed donors .…”
Section: Gene and Environmental Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Speit et al (2000) investigating the base excision and crosslink repairs suggested that a disturbed excision repair can have more severe consequences with regards of CA formation after formaldehyde exposure than a disturbed crosslink repair. Costa et al (2008) found no significant effect of genetic polymorphism of DNA repair enzymes on the investigated genotoxic end points (micronuclei, SCE, and primary DNA lesions determined by the comet assay).…”
Section: Gene and Environmental Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It is widely found in indoor living or working environments. (1)(2)(3)(4) FA is also produced in natural processes. For example, it is a natural metabolite of living organisms and is found in bodily fluids, tissues, and cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%