2008
DOI: 10.2478/v10055-008-0009-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects in the bivalve mollusks <i>Macoma balthica</i> and <i>Mytilus edulis</i> from the Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The large inter-individual variability associated to the low baseline frequency for this biomarker confirming the need for the scoring of a consistent number of cells in an adequate number of animals for each study point. Sampling size in most of studies conducted with mollusc species have been scoring 1000-2000 cells per animal (Izquierdo et al, 2003;Hagger et al, 2005;Bolognesi et al, , 2004Bolognesi et al, , 2006aMagni et al, 2006;Baršienė et al, , 2006bBaršienė et al, , 2008bBaršienė et al, , 2010aBaršienė et al, , 2010bKopecka et al, 2006;Nigro et al, 2006;Schiedek et al, 2006;Francioni et al, 2007;Siu et al, 2008;Koukouzika andDimitriadis, 2005, 2008) and previous reviews have sug-gested that when using fish erythrocytes at least 2000-4000 cells should be scored per animal (Udroiu et al, 2006;Bolognesi et al, 2006). Previously scorings of 5000-10 000 fish erythrocytes where used for a MN analysis (Baršienė et al, 2004).…”
Section: Sample and Cell Scoring Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The large inter-individual variability associated to the low baseline frequency for this biomarker confirming the need for the scoring of a consistent number of cells in an adequate number of animals for each study point. Sampling size in most of studies conducted with mollusc species have been scoring 1000-2000 cells per animal (Izquierdo et al, 2003;Hagger et al, 2005;Bolognesi et al, , 2004Bolognesi et al, , 2006aMagni et al, 2006;Baršienė et al, , 2006bBaršienė et al, , 2008bBaršienė et al, , 2010aBaršienė et al, , 2010bKopecka et al, 2006;Nigro et al, 2006;Schiedek et al, 2006;Francioni et al, 2007;Siu et al, 2008;Koukouzika andDimitriadis, 2005, 2008) and previous reviews have sug-gested that when using fish erythrocytes at least 2000-4000 cells should be scored per animal (Udroiu et al, 2006;Bolognesi et al, 2006). Previously scorings of 5000-10 000 fish erythrocytes where used for a MN analysis (Baršienė et al, 2004).…”
Section: Sample and Cell Scoring Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mussel sampling size in MN assays range from 5 to 20 mussels per site as reported in the literature (Venier and Zampieron, 1997;Bolognesi et al, 2004;Baršienė et al, 2004Baršienė et al, , 2006e, 2008aBaršienė et al, , 2008bFrancioni et al, 2007;Siu et al, 2008). Evidence suggests that a sample size of ten specimens per site is enough for the assessment of environmental genotoxicity levels and evaluation of the existence of genetic risk zones.…”
Section: Sample and Cell Scoring Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Micronucleus (MN) test was performed following the protocol outlined by Baršiene et al (32). A portion of the gill tissue was placed in a drop of methanol acetic acid mixture (3:1) on a clean glass slide.…”
Section: Micronucleus Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Відповідні зміни спостерігали після забарв-лення цитологічних препаратів 5%-им розчи-ном гімзи під мікроскопом з олійною імерсією, ×1000 і виражали з розрахунку на 1000 клітин (‰) [20]. Загальна кількість проаналізованих клітин на цитологічному препараті складала не менше 2 тис.…”
Section: рис 1 структура досліджуваних металовмісних композитів: Nvunclassified