2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97427-9_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomics of Insect Resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the CGs had modified expressions under several biotic stress conditions including infection with the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis), and on maize organs and at developmental stages relevant to FAW feeding. The expression of GWAS-based CGs in maize ear-related organs and developmental stages indicated that these genes could have an influence on the accumulation of assimilates in the grain among which were phenolic compounds critical for resistance to storage pests such as MW (89,114,115). In agreement with the negative interaction between plant biotic and abiotic stress responses resulting from negative cross-talk between absicic acid (ABA) and jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and ethylene (ET) signaling pathways (108)(109)(110)112,116,117), most of the CGs were upregulated and downregulated under biotic and abiotic stress conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Promising Cgs For Maize Resistance To Multiple-insect Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the CGs had modified expressions under several biotic stress conditions including infection with the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis), and on maize organs and at developmental stages relevant to FAW feeding. The expression of GWAS-based CGs in maize ear-related organs and developmental stages indicated that these genes could have an influence on the accumulation of assimilates in the grain among which were phenolic compounds critical for resistance to storage pests such as MW (89,114,115). In agreement with the negative interaction between plant biotic and abiotic stress responses resulting from negative cross-talk between absicic acid (ABA) and jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and ethylene (ET) signaling pathways (108)(109)(110)112,116,117), most of the CGs were upregulated and downregulated under biotic and abiotic stress conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Promising Cgs For Maize Resistance To Multiple-insect Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the CGs had modified expressions under several biotic stress conditions including infection with the European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis ), and on maize organs and at developmental stages relevant to FAW feeding. The expression of GWAS-based CGs in maize ear-related organs and developmental stages indicated that these genes could have an influence on the accumulation of assimilates in the grain, among which were phenolic compounds critical for resistance to storage pests such as MW [ 89 , 114 , 115 ]. In agreement with the negative interaction between plant biotic and abiotic stress responses resulting from negative cross-talk between absicic acid (ABA) and the jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and ethylene (ET) signaling pathways [ 108 , 109 , 110 , 112 , 116 , 117 ], most of the CGs were upregulated and downregulated under biotic and abiotic stress conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…infection with the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis), and on maize organs and at developmental stages relevant to FAW feeding. The expression of GWAS-based CGs in maize ear-related organs and developmental stages indicated that these genes could have an influence on the accumulation of assimilates in the grain among which were phenolic compounds critical for resistance to storage pests such as MW (88,113,114). In agreement with the negative interaction between plant biotic and abiotic stress responses resulting from negative cross-talk between absicic acid (ABA) and jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and ethylene (ET) signaling pathways (107)(108)(109)111,115,116), most of the CGs were upregulated and downregulated under biotic and abiotic stress conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Most Of the Cgs Had Modified Expressions Under Several Biotimentioning
confidence: 99%