2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomics of gynaecological carcinosarcomas and future treatment options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, patients with advanced uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma show low response rates to chemotherapy and overall have a poor prognosis. 16 Three out of nine patients with carcinosarcoma in our trial demonstrated durable responses to immunotherapy. A significant percentage of uterine carcinosarcomas shows mismatch repair protein (MMRP) deficiency/microsatellite instability which is associated with response to single-agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Similarly, patients with advanced uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma show low response rates to chemotherapy and overall have a poor prognosis. 16 Three out of nine patients with carcinosarcoma in our trial demonstrated durable responses to immunotherapy. A significant percentage of uterine carcinosarcomas shows mismatch repair protein (MMRP) deficiency/microsatellite instability which is associated with response to single-agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Uterine carcinosarcoma incidence rates are five times higher than those of ovarian carcinosarcomas, resulting in fewer studies focusing on ovarian carcinosarcomas in the literature [ 41 , 42 ]. Whereas uterine carcinosarcomas are heterogeneous in their molecular profiling, ovarian carcinosarcomas represent a more homogenous group [ 7 ]. In an analysis of the transcriptome of ovarian carcinosarcomas, Gotoh et al found that the gene expression of ovarian carcinosarcomas most resembled that of high-grade serous ovarian cancer [ 17 ].…”
Section: Molecular Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent molecular data that are reviewed in this article suggest that these tumors are more likely epithelial tumors that have undergone significant de-differentiation. The current biological theory posits that these tumors are either derived from a single progenitor that gives rise to carcinoma and sarcoma cells or from one progenitor carcinoma cell that undergoes a sarcomatous transformation [ 6 , 7 ]. These tumors are now considered epithelial in origin, and this designation has led to updated treatment algorithms that are similar to those of other epithelial endometrial and ovarian tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCS tumorigenesis is thought to be based on the "conversion hypothesis" of sarcomatous transformation of a differentiated cancer cell-type (carcinoma) into undifferentiated (sarcomatous) malignancy (29,30). It is generally accepted that the transformation is not driven by somatic mutation, but via reprogramming of gene expression and associated with high level of genomic instabilities (see Figure 1B).…”
Section: Hgsoc and Ocs Are Often Regarded As "Class C" Tumors Where Tmentioning
confidence: 99%