2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.25.314088
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomics of an avian neo-sex chromosome reveals the evolutionary dynamics of recombination suppression and sex-linked genes

Abstract: How the avian sex chromosomes first evolved from autosomes remains elusive as 100 million years (Myr) of divergence and degeneration obscure their evolutionary history. Sylvioidea songbirds is an emerging model for understanding avian sex chromosome evolution because a unique chromosome fusion event ∼24 Myr ago has formed enlarged “neo-sex chromosomes” consisting of an added (new) and an ancestral (old) part. Here, we report the female genome (ZW) of one Sylvioidea species, the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(109 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These repeats may have contributed both to the expansion of the MHC genes and the gene rearrangements in the core MHC region compared to earlier bird orders. Repeats cannot be efficiently removed from lowrecombining chromosomal regions, and as expected the great reed warbler ancestral W-chromosome, a sex-linked region that does not recombine, is extremely enriched for repeats compared to the rest of the genome (Sigeman et al, 2021). How then can the repeat content be so high in the rather large MHC region, approximately 5.5 Mb in the great reed warbler?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These repeats may have contributed both to the expansion of the MHC genes and the gene rearrangements in the core MHC region compared to earlier bird orders. Repeats cannot be efficiently removed from lowrecombining chromosomal regions, and as expected the great reed warbler ancestral W-chromosome, a sex-linked region that does not recombine, is extremely enriched for repeats compared to the rest of the genome (Sigeman et al, 2021). How then can the repeat content be so high in the rather large MHC region, approximately 5.5 Mb in the great reed warbler?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suh) containing Repbase repeats (Bao et al, 2015), repeats from chicken and the zebra finch (Hillier et al, 2004;Warren et al, 2010) and curated repeats from hooded crow and flycatcher (Suh et al, 2018;Vijay et al, 2016). In contrast to Sigeman et al (2021) we did not include uncurated de novo predicted repeats in the repeat library as we observed a considerable overlap with multicopy genes.…”
Section: Repeat Content In the Mhc Regions Versus The Rest Of The Genomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, the closest relative to the reed warbler with a published reference genome is the great tit ( Parus major ) (GCA_001522545.3, deposited in NCBI; Laine et al 2016 ), but the unpublished genome of the garden warbler ( Sylvia borin ) is available in public databases (GCA_014839755.1, deposited in NCBI). There is also a genome in preprint from the Acrocephalus genus, the great reed warbler ( A. arundinaceus ) ( Sigeman, Strandh, et al 2020 ), but the scaffolds are not chromosome length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the closest relative to the reed warbler with a published reference genome is the great tit (Parus major) (GCA_001522545.3, deposited in NCBI; Laine et al 2016), but the unpublished genome of the garden warbler (Sylvia borin) is available in public databases (GCA_014839755.1, deposited in NCBI). There is also a genome in preprint from the Acrocephalus genus, the great reed warbler (A. arundinaceus) (Sigeman et al 2020a), but the scaffolds are not chromosome-length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%