2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomics landscape of 185 Streptococcus thermophilus and identification of fermentation biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strains from Classes 4–6 could not be used alone, but rather only as assistant strains to improve the flavor or texture of the fermented products. Zhao et al (2021) evaluated the acidification capability of 85 strains of S. thermophilus based on the TA and the acid production rate. The TA achieved with and the acid production rate of strains carrying the PrtS gene were significantly higher than those of strains not carrying this gene, and these strains were clustered together in the phylogenetic tree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strains from Classes 4–6 could not be used alone, but rather only as assistant strains to improve the flavor or texture of the fermented products. Zhao et al (2021) evaluated the acidification capability of 85 strains of S. thermophilus based on the TA and the acid production rate. The TA achieved with and the acid production rate of strains carrying the PrtS gene were significantly higher than those of strains not carrying this gene, and these strains were clustered together in the phylogenetic tree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. thermophilus strains from diverse sources have different phenotypic traits. Some studies have defined a growth score and identified a missense mutation ( Zhao et al, 2021 ) or the existence of cell-envelope proteinase- ( PrtS ) ( Dandoy et al, 2011 ; Boulay et al, 2020 ) and urease-encoding genes ( Zotta et al, 2008 ; Arioli et al, 2017 ; Yamauchi et al, 2019 ) to predict the relationship between the genotype and fermentation characteristics of the strains. One disadvantage of these methods is that they can only be applied to investigate bacterial monocultures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zhao et al. (2022) analyzed the genome of Lac. paracasei SLP16, identifying genes encoding acid tolerance and bile salt tolerance, few antibiotic‐resistant genes, and on toxin‐encoding virulence genes.…”
Section: Population Genomics Of Labmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bulgaricus showed that a significant association exists between l ‐lactate dehydrogenase ( lldD ; Ldb2036) and the acidification rate (Song et al., 2021). The BGWAS of S. thermophilus found that a missense mutation, G1118698T, in the AcnA gene is related to its acidification capacity (Zhao et al., 2021). The AcnA gene encodes an aconitate hydratase, which is involved in succinate and citrate production, contributing to milk acidification.…”
Section: Food Science Towards Genomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional fermentations (e.g., milk products) are also benefiting from precision fermentation, essentially to screen the different genomes and connections between phylogeny, environmental and phenotypic features for the selection of specific desired characteristics. Next generation sequencing techniques are essential to identify and predict the behavior and potential of the strains (Zhao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Precision Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%