2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-022-02840-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic tools reveal complex social organization of an invasive large mammal (Sus scrofa)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strategies for managing invasive and feral wildlife species increasingly depend on population genetic analyses to evaluate genetic structure [ 42 ], identify sources of new population outbreaks [ 43 ] and understand the evolutionary history of invasive introductions [ 44 ]. SNP datasets can be utilized at fine geographic scales to better understand fundamental aspects of breeding biology, demographic turnover, and kin structure in pest populations [ 45 ]. Yet despite rapid technological advances in sequencing technology, there is routinely a need for methods that enable quick and relatively inexpensive genotyping at the scale of hundreds to thousands of SNPs for tens to hundreds of individuals sampled across multiple populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies for managing invasive and feral wildlife species increasingly depend on population genetic analyses to evaluate genetic structure [ 42 ], identify sources of new population outbreaks [ 43 ] and understand the evolutionary history of invasive introductions [ 44 ]. SNP datasets can be utilized at fine geographic scales to better understand fundamental aspects of breeding biology, demographic turnover, and kin structure in pest populations [ 45 ]. Yet despite rapid technological advances in sequencing technology, there is routinely a need for methods that enable quick and relatively inexpensive genotyping at the scale of hundreds to thousands of SNPs for tens to hundreds of individuals sampled across multiple populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the extent of movements was strongly influenced by the availability of high‐quality bottomland habitats, with individuals released in low‐quality coniferous forests making more extensive movements. Wild pigs are a socially dynamic species that frequently live in social groups 45 . Thus, while this previous study revealed insights into the movement behavior of invasive wild pigs introduced into novel environments, it did not account for how the social dynamics of wild pigs could potentially alter movement after translocation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Wild pigs are a socially dynamic species that frequently live in social groups. 45 Thus, while this previous study revealed insights into the movement behavior of invasive wild pigs introduced into novel environments, it did not account for how the social dynamics of wild pigs could potentially alter movement after translocation. Furthermore, illegal translocations of wild pigs, while unknown, likely involve release of multiple individuals simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Wild pigs are known for their social behaviors and often form matrilineal social groups, known as sounders, to forage and provide protection from predators [74,75]. A sounder typically consists of one or more adult females (sows) and their offspring, which can include piglets of varying ages [34]. The size of a sounder can vary based on factors such as habitat, forage availability, time of year, and population density [76].…”
Section: A Molecular Epidemiological Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we conducted a case study within one of the wild pig populations to investigate the potential insights that molecular epidemiological analysis of TTSuV1 could provide for transmission studies. Our hypotheses posited that closely related pigs, especially females and juveniles, would exhibit spatial proximity given their matriarchal social structure [34]. We further hypothesized that the virus would be more likely transmitted within family groups where pigs are geographically and genetically close to one another than to unrelated individuals that were geographically disparate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%