2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic testing among patients with newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: A contemporary clinical practice patterns study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple “hotspot” assays can quickly exhaust available tissue and lead to false negatives due to tissue depletion [ 21 , 29 , 39 , 42 44 ]. A recent study of advanced NSCLC found that NGS panels had a 39% lower rate of unsuccessful genotyping, resulting in 30% fewer missed treatment opportunities compared to non-NGS assays [ 18 ]. Although NGS may take several weeks to process, rapid EGFR testing workflows have been reported and allow treatment with EGFR -directed therapies within days, all without compromising NGS workflows [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple “hotspot” assays can quickly exhaust available tissue and lead to false negatives due to tissue depletion [ 21 , 29 , 39 , 42 44 ]. A recent study of advanced NSCLC found that NGS panels had a 39% lower rate of unsuccessful genotyping, resulting in 30% fewer missed treatment opportunities compared to non-NGS assays [ 18 ]. Although NGS may take several weeks to process, rapid EGFR testing workflows have been reported and allow treatment with EGFR -directed therapies within days, all without compromising NGS workflows [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular testing (also referred to as biomarker testing, genomic analysis, molecular profiling, or molecular analysis) of lung needle biopsy specimens is crucial for identifying subsets of patients who are candidates for targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Despite recommendations by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for molecular testing in all cases of advanced NSCLC [ 6 ], testing levels and results remain suboptimal [ 2 , 16 , 17 ], which translates to missed treatment opportunities [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRAF mutations can be detected both by PCR or IHC methods, although these techniques are commonly limited to BRAF V600E‐mutation detection, in contrast to NGS testing, which includes multiple gene panels capable of evaluating V600E and non‐V600E mutations. Although BRAF analysis is considered a minimum requirement for NSCLC diagnosis, it has been reported that these have only been tested in approximately one half of patients when diagnosed using non‐NGS techniques 11 …”
Section: Driver Alterations In Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. 3 Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga 849-8501, Japan. 4 Department of Transfusion Medicine, Saga University Hospital, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga 849-8501, Japan.…”
Section: Declarations Ethics Approval and Consent To Participatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-gene panel testing of cancer by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is now widespread, leading to proposals for optimal treatment of individual cancer patients in the clinical practice of oncology [ 1 , 2 ]. Therapeutic approaches targeting driver gene abnormalities have been separately developed for each cancer type [ 3 ], but the basket trials, which examine whether a molecular targeted agent works for various types of cancers with the same driver gene abnormalities, are increasing [ 4 ]. Variants of the HER2 gene, which encodes the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein, are one of the most promising therapeutic targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%