The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic surveillance of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in the period pre-PCV10 and post-PCV10 introduction in Brazil

Abstract: In 2010, Brazil introduced the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) into the national children’s immunization programme. This study describes the genetic characteristics of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates before and after PCV10 introduction. A subset of 466 [pre-PCV10 (2008–2009): n=232, post-PCV10 (2012–2013): n=234;<5 years old: n=310, ≥5 years old: n=156] pneumococcal isolates, collected through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Brazil, it was observed an increase of 7% to 16.4% in the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease caused by serotype 19A, after the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction, especially in 2016–2017 [ 29 ]. The molecular detection of both ermB and mef genes in pneumococcal invasive strains was higher in comparison with other studies in Brazil (3 in 159 strains– 1.9%) during 2010–2012 [ 30 ] and 7% during 2012–2013 [ 31 ]. Probably, because these studies evaluated the genes’ presence in isolated strains.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In Brazil, it was observed an increase of 7% to 16.4% in the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease caused by serotype 19A, after the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction, especially in 2016–2017 [ 29 ]. The molecular detection of both ermB and mef genes in pneumococcal invasive strains was higher in comparison with other studies in Brazil (3 in 159 strains– 1.9%) during 2010–2012 [ 30 ] and 7% during 2012–2013 [ 31 ]. Probably, because these studies evaluated the genes’ presence in isolated strains.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…At present, there is an increasing number of reports that have utilized WGS for surveillance of capsular types of S. pneumoniae causing IPD ( 21 , 48 51 ), but this methodology has not been widely adopted yet ( 52 56 ). These may be in part due to the lack of accessibility of Illumina sequencing to medium and small-size laboratories, making it necessary to send the samples to reference laboratories, as well as to the fact that most programs utilized for in silico serotyping require some bioinformatics skills not available in all laboratories ( 18 , 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the macrolide resistance did not change (from 40.6% to 38.7%), but the rate of resistance to macrolides in the non-vaccine serotypes increased from 21.0% to 27.0% ( Farrell et al., 2007 ). In Brazil, before and after introduction of PCV10 the frequency of macrolide-resistant isolates was 12.0% and 21.0% respectively ( Almeida et al., 2021 ). In Germany, the frequency of macrolide-resistant pneumococcus after the introduction of PCV7 decreased from 24.7% to 17.2%, and it continued decreasing after the introduction of PCV13 (8.2%) ( Imöhl et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our erm (B) frequency was similar that reported in Colombia before PCV13 (98.0%) ( Ramos et al., 2014 ). On the other hand, in Brazil before the introduction of PCV13 erm (B) was detected in an lower frequency, 10.0% of intermediate or resistant erythromycin S. pneumoniae isolates and 7.0% of those isolates had both genes ( Almeida et al., 2021 ). In the United States, after the introduction of PCV7, was found an increase in 18.0% the proportion of strains positive for both genes between the first and last year of surveillance study, with a corresponding decrease in the prevalence of positive isolates for only mef (A) (72.0% to 58.0%) and only erm (B) (15.8% to 11.2%) ( Farrell et al., 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%