2002
DOI: 10.1101/gr.306102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Signature Tags (GSTs): A System for Profiling Genomic DNA

Abstract: Genomic signature tags (GSTs) are the products of a method we have developed for identifying and quantitatively analyzing genomic DNAs. The DNA is initially fragmented with a type II restriction enzyme. An oligonucleotide adaptor containing a recognition site for MmeI, a type IIS restriction enzyme, is then used to release 21-bp tags from fixed positions in the DNA relative to the sites recognized by the fragmenting enzyme. These tags are PCR-amplified, purified, concatenated, and then cloned and sequenced. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A genomic signature tag (GST) approach for determining differences between CO-92 and EV76 (biovar Orientalis) was reported recently, and suggested the potential absence of six regions in the EV76 genome (Dunn et al 2002). Our data reveals that only two of the regions appear to be absent from the EV76 genome, both of which were predicted, but not fully defined, by the GST method.…”
Section: Microarray Validationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…A genomic signature tag (GST) approach for determining differences between CO-92 and EV76 (biovar Orientalis) was reported recently, and suggested the potential absence of six regions in the EV76 genome (Dunn et al 2002). Our data reveals that only two of the regions appear to be absent from the EV76 genome, both of which were predicted, but not fully defined, by the GST method.…”
Section: Microarray Validationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These methods involve profiling clones with microarrays that identify previously unknown genes in environmental samples (107), subtractive hybridization to eliminate all sequences that hybridize with another environment, or subtractive hybridization to identify differentially expressed genes (35), and genomic sequence tags (28). These methods will enhance the efficiency of screening and aid in identifying minor components in communities and genes that define community uniqueness.…”
Section: Identifying Sequences Of Interest In Large Metagenomic Libramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our understanding of large structural rearrangements in the human genomes is just beginning. SAGE-based digital karyotyping (Dunn et al 2002;Wang et al 2002), array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) (Pinkel et al 1998), and whole-genome tiling arrays (Kim et al 2005) have contributed to this field by identifying large chunks of deletions and assessing copy number variations of amplified regions in disease genomes compared to normal and reference genomes. However, neither the single-tag sequencing approach nor the hybridization methods can identify balanced structural variations such as insertions, inversions, and translocations in genome rearrangements.…”
Section: Dna-pet For Genome Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%