2023
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01578-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Sequencing from Sputum for Tuberculosis Disease Diagnosis, Lineage Determination, and Drug Susceptibility Prediction

Abstract: Universal access to drug susceptibility testing for newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients is recommended. Access to culture-based diagnostics remains limited, and targeted molecular assays are vulnerable to emerging resistance mutations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we have not explored the potential of culture-free WGS as a diagnostic tool for TB, we performed as many runs as necessary to achieve sufficient coverage and depth to reach our goal, regardless of the sequencing cost per sample. With this effort we were able to perform culture-free sequencing, with high quality, in 76% (61/80) of diagnostic samples, suggesting that further improvements of the technique will be needed as shown by others 15 . In fact, while previous studies showed that smear-negative and scanty sputa could be enriched and sequenced occasionally [10][11][12][13] , a formal testing of the limit of detection is still needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Since we have not explored the potential of culture-free WGS as a diagnostic tool for TB, we performed as many runs as necessary to achieve sufficient coverage and depth to reach our goal, regardless of the sequencing cost per sample. With this effort we were able to perform culture-free sequencing, with high quality, in 76% (61/80) of diagnostic samples, suggesting that further improvements of the technique will be needed as shown by others 15 . In fact, while previous studies showed that smear-negative and scanty sputa could be enriched and sequenced occasionally [10][11][12][13] , a formal testing of the limit of detection is still needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We generated an in silico metagenomic readset from a variety of organisms (human, bacteria, virus) at ratios commonly seen in M. tuberculosis metagenomic samples (see Generating in silico metagenomic reads) [8]. After removing Nanopore reads shorter than 500bp or with an ambiguous base, we were left with 234984 reads with a total of 2.48 gigabases [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We simulated metagenomic Nanopore and Illumina sequencing reads to a mixture ratio that approximates that found in patient sputa [8], albeit with a slightly higher mycobacterial component. In total, 4.5 and 0.9 gigabases were generated for Nanopore and Illumina, respectively, at proportions: 46% each for bacteria and human, 6% M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC), and 1% each for virus and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM).…”
Section: Generating In Silico Metagenomic Readsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rapid data sharing enables genomic epidemiological analysis, a key part of the global public health response to the COVID‐19 pandemic 25 . Nanopore technology has been used to rapidly sequence the emerging and reemerging pathogens including Zika, Ebola, and other pathogens in multiple outbreaks, where surveillance and genomic investigation capacities are limited 26–30 . Oxford Nanopore has developed workflows for rapid preparation and sequencing of SARS‐CoV‐2 whole genomes, with starter packs that are affordable for LMICs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%