2019
DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.05.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic profiling of cell-free circulating tumor DNA in patients with colorectal cancer and its fidelity to the genomics of the tumor biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, 23 (36%) of the 64 mutations that were identified from plasma were undetected in the tumor tissues. In addition, similar discordance rates of 28-84% have been reported in several previous studies (Barata et al, 2017;Chae et al, 2016;Li et al, 2019). A study conducted by Rothwell et al (2019) demonstrated that NGS of cfDNA and patient's corresponding tumor tissues from 39 patients with advanced-stage solid tumor revealed up to 30% of mutations identified from plasma samples were not detected in tumor tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In our study, 23 (36%) of the 64 mutations that were identified from plasma were undetected in the tumor tissues. In addition, similar discordance rates of 28-84% have been reported in several previous studies (Barata et al, 2017;Chae et al, 2016;Li et al, 2019). A study conducted by Rothwell et al (2019) demonstrated that NGS of cfDNA and patient's corresponding tumor tissues from 39 patients with advanced-stage solid tumor revealed up to 30% of mutations identified from plasma samples were not detected in tumor tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…DNA extracted from the serum is variably fragmented, but representative sequences with characteristic cancer-related aberrations could reproducibly demonstrate suitable amplification and accurate sequencing (Ma et al, 2017). Recently, there has been consensus in the literature that ctDNA obtained by liquid biopsy is a convenient carrier of the actual genetic composition and is potentially more informative than tissue-derived nucleic acids archived from the time of diagnosis (Li et al, 2019;Remon et al, 2019;Vitiello et al, 2019). Additionally, ctDNA is useful for finding therapeutic targets after several cycles of therapy (Bhangu et al, 2018;Garlan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Using Ctdna To Follow-up Cancer Treatment and Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall concordance between plasma and matched tumor tissues assessed by NGS is only approximately 25% (Pishvaian et al, 2017). Internal quality control guidelines and ctDNA reference materials are still not available to support strong and reliable liquid biopsy-based cancer diagnostics and followup (Li et al, 2019). To date, there are no cross-platform validations, and therefore, the clinical predictive value of variant detection must be considered with caution (Merker et al, 2018).…”
Section: The "Bottle Neck" Of Ctdna Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, liquid biopsies may allow the capturing of ctDNA released from multiple tumor regions and could reflect intratumoral-heterogeneity that might be missed in tissue biopsy [ 28 , 29 ]. The development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has assisted the validation of clinical applications of ctDNA in cancer management, including, tumor profiling [ 30 , 31 ], early cancer detection [ 32 , 33 ], minimal residual disease detection [ 34 , 35 ] and treatment monitoring [ 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Circulating Cell-free Dna (Cfdna) and Circulating Tumor Dmentioning
confidence: 99%