2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-021-01203-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic prediction using training population design in interspecific soybean populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first demonstration of GS in pre-breeding was in exotic maize populations successfully selecting for yield ( Combs and Bernardo, 2013 ). Genomic selection in CWR pre-breeding was also validated recently in soybean ( Beche et al, 2021 ). Very good prediction accuracies for several quantitative traits were reported using a NAM breeding population with three wild Plant Inventory parents ( Beche et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Pre-breeding Techniques For Transferring Useful Traits To Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first demonstration of GS in pre-breeding was in exotic maize populations successfully selecting for yield ( Combs and Bernardo, 2013 ). Genomic selection in CWR pre-breeding was also validated recently in soybean ( Beche et al, 2021 ). Very good prediction accuracies for several quantitative traits were reported using a NAM breeding population with three wild Plant Inventory parents ( Beche et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Pre-breeding Techniques For Transferring Useful Traits To Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic selection in CWR pre-breeding was also validated recently in soybean ( Beche et al, 2021 ). Very good prediction accuracies for several quantitative traits were reported using a NAM breeding population with three wild Plant Inventory parents ( Beche et al, 2021 ). An excellent example for pre-breeding for marginal lands using focused identification of germplasm strategy (FIGS) is found in studies with barley, wheat and faba bean landraces ( Endresen et al, 2011 ; Khazaei et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Pre-breeding Techniques For Transferring Useful Traits To Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a cross between cultivated and wild progenitors of soybean ( G. max X G. sojae ), Beche et al (2021) reported that the yield-related alleles were associated with the cultivated elite line, but the protein content alleles were from the wild progenitor. The difference in the distribution of trait-contributing alleles in such crosses has a greater impact on their predictive accuracy.…”
Section: Gs: Implications In Crop Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contiguous breeding programs are very common where new cross combinations are added each year. In such cases, using nested association mapping (NAM) population is better in terms of prediction accuracy (for yield 0.68 and oil and for protein content 0.76) than biparental population, showing the potential of NAM where connectedness is there among the population on the basis of the common parent ( Beche et al, 2021 ). Similarly, Stewart-Brown et al (2019) have reported that, for better predictions in soybean, it is important to have good relatedness among training and breeding populations.…”
Section: Gs: Implications In Crop Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because reGBS has high rates of missing data and under calls heterozygous alleles, a 6K Illumina Infinium chip (BARCSoySNP6K) is still actively used by the soybean community (Song et al, 2020, Beche et al, 2021, Li et al, 2021). This chip allows researchers to obtain low missing data with high accuracy of calling heterozygotes and has an easy workflow for processing samples and data analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%