2020
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-020720-042553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Prediction of (Mal)Adaptation Across Current and Future Climatic Landscapes

Abstract: Signals of local adaptation have been found in many plants and animals, highlighting the heterogeneity in the distribution of adaptive genetic variation throughout species ranges. In the coming decades, global climate change is expected to induce shifts in the selective pressures that shape this adaptive variation. These changes in selective pressures will likely result in varying degrees of local climate maladaptation and spatial reshuffling of the underlying distributions of adaptive alleles. There is a grow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
279
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(186 reference statements)
0
279
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, denser sampling of wild populations globally is needed to model GD at finer scales and better inform conservation planning and management of the species genetic substrate. Population‐specific genomic information is starting to unlock our potential to understand evolutionary responses of species and ecological assemblages to environmental change, including the ability to estimate relevant conservation metrics, such as the magnitude of mutation load in wild populations or the adaptive genetic variation revealed using landscape genomic analyses (Fitzpatrick and Keller 2015, Capblancq et al 2020). While the coarse spatial grain used in our assessment cannot directly inform conservation strategies for GD at local population levels, it contributes towards understanding of global adaptive capacity and the potential evolutionary responses of mammal assemblages to climate and land‐use change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, denser sampling of wild populations globally is needed to model GD at finer scales and better inform conservation planning and management of the species genetic substrate. Population‐specific genomic information is starting to unlock our potential to understand evolutionary responses of species and ecological assemblages to environmental change, including the ability to estimate relevant conservation metrics, such as the magnitude of mutation load in wild populations or the adaptive genetic variation revealed using landscape genomic analyses (Fitzpatrick and Keller 2015, Capblancq et al 2020). While the coarse spatial grain used in our assessment cannot directly inform conservation strategies for GD at local population levels, it contributes towards understanding of global adaptive capacity and the potential evolutionary responses of mammal assemblages to climate and land‐use change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML has long ago been used for ecological niche modeling [129,130] and functional genomics [131]. However, ML has started permeating, until very recently, other approaches more relevant to this review such as GWSS [128,132] and GP [133][134][135]. In this latter example, ML techniques (i.e., deep learning) outperformed GP's predictive ability for single traits in multi-environment trials (Figure 1k).…”
Section: A Way Forward Via Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All rights reserved. [14]. Evolutionary biologists argue that models must consider genetic variation and adaptation [3,15].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%