2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3920-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic prediction in contrast to a genome-wide association study in explaining heritable variation of complex growth traits in breeding populations of Eucalyptus

Abstract: BackgroundThe advent of high-throughput genotyping technologies coupled to genomic prediction methods established a new paradigm to integrate genomics and breeding. We carried out whole-genome prediction and contrasted it to a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for growth traits in breeding populations of Eucalyptus benthamii (n =505) and Eucalyptus pellita (n =732). Both species are of increasing commercial interest for the development of germplasm adapted to environmental stresses.ResultsPredictive ability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
69
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, blue line) is located inside gene model Eucgr.H03281, a gene encoding for an armadillo/beta‐catenin‐like repeats‐containing protein‐related, whose function is involved in the cellulose biosynthetic process. In a recent GWAS study in another Eucalyptus species, E. pellita , we also found a significant association for growth inside Eucgr.F03806, a gene that codes for another armadillo/beta‐catenin‐like repeat positioned on a different chromosome (6) (Müller et al ., ). This gene in Arabidopsis thaliana (AT1G77460) transcribes the protein cellulose synthase interactive 3 (CSI3), which regulates primary cell wall biosynthesis and cellulose microfibrils organization (Lei et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, blue line) is located inside gene model Eucgr.H03281, a gene encoding for an armadillo/beta‐catenin‐like repeats‐containing protein‐related, whose function is involved in the cellulose biosynthetic process. In a recent GWAS study in another Eucalyptus species, E. pellita , we also found a significant association for growth inside Eucgr.F03806, a gene that codes for another armadillo/beta‐catenin‐like repeat positioned on a different chromosome (6) (Müller et al ., ). This gene in Arabidopsis thaliana (AT1G77460) transcribes the protein cellulose synthase interactive 3 (CSI3), which regulates primary cell wall biosynthesis and cellulose microfibrils organization (Lei et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Various studies attempted GWAS for growth traits in forest trees, namely in Populus (Porth et al ., ; Allwright et al ., ; Du et al ., ; Fahrenkrog et al ., ), Pinus (Bartholomé et al ., ; Lu et al ., ) and Eucalyptus (Cappa et al ., ; Müller et al ., ; Resende et al ., ). Despite the considerably large number of individuals used in our study for each population and for the combined dataset, our results suggested that much larger numbers will be necessary to identify discrete regions capturing larger fractions of the genetic variance of complex traits as indicated by simulations (Spencer et al ., ; Visscher et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The levels of accuracy which our GP reached are high, and comparable to those that are used to inform selections in crop 4650 , tree 12,51 and livestock breeding programmes 52,53 . Thus, our results have the potential to increase the speed at which we can successfully breed ash dieback resistant trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Mixing different approaches is somehow a good way to get more accurate and reliable results while they are based on genomic data and validated by different methods at the same time. In a study on Eucalyptus, Müller et al (2017) showed that how genomic data can be useful for discovering heritable variation and how the genome wide analysis validate the results of genomic prediction (Müller et al, 2017).…”
Section: Genomic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%